Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-301House Oversight

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the Superseding Indictment is too vague, failing to identif...

Legal Filing

Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the Superseding Indictment is too vague, failing to identify specific dates, accusers, or details of alleged crimes, and thus violates her constitutional rights. They request that Counts One through Four be dismissed or that the court direct the government to provide a Bill of Particulars.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-301
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.