Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-31501House OversightFinancial Record

Witness alleges use of Epstein case to fund a Ponzi scheme and mentions lawyers Russell Adler and Brad Edwards

The passage provides a concrete allegation that a defendant leveraged the high‑profile Epstein case to attract investors for an alleged Ponzi scheme, naming specific lawyers (Russell Adler, Brad Edwar Witness claims the defendant used the Epstein case as a selling point for a Ponzi scheme. Names Russell Adler and Brad Edwards as co‑conspirators who discussed illegal activities. Allegation that fun

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #017516
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage provides a concrete allegation that a defendant leveraged the high‑profile Epstein case to attract investors for an alleged Ponzi scheme, naming specific lawyers (Russell Adler, Brad Edwar Witness claims the defendant used the Epstein case as a selling point for a Ponzi scheme. Names Russell Adler and Brad Edwards as co‑conspirators who discussed illegal activities. Allegation that fun

Tags

financial-flowinvestor-deceptionforeign-influence-via-epstein-ponzi-schemefinancial-fraudlawyer-misconductepstein-caselegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightcriminal-conspiracy

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
trying to make money. : was a real case going on, but that within that ] would Q. And these young lawyers, would you consider : have to create some sort of fictions in order tose]. Mr. Edwards to be a young lawyer or a middle-aged : the fake product. lawyer? : Q. Okay. At the time that you decided to use A. Young lawyer. i the Epstein case as part of your illicit Ponzi scheme Q. Okay. Was he one of young lawyers that came : theme, I think you testified earlier today, when you to these fundraisers at your home? were in some dire straights, you needed an influx of A. J] don't recal] whether he was there or not. money, right? } recall] him being at some, but ] didn't know if he A. Yes. was at all of them. t Q. That's when you decided to use the Epstein Q. Okay. You do recall] him coming to some of i matters, correct? the fundraisers, though, correct? i A. Yes. A. I recall him being at my home. It may have : Q. Okay. And you knew, | assume, being the been for firm parties or other parties, it may have : Ponzi scheme mastermind here, that you needed to make been for fundraisers there. s sure that you had at least a working knowledge of the 16 Q. And that was during the time period that the i Epstein case so that you could answer questions to the Ponzi scheme was stil] going on, correct? 3 investors. I recognize that you left the room and gis A. Yes. H told them to look at it, but you had to some knowledge 19 Q. Did Adler ever the tell you about any : of the case, right? 20 discussions he had with Brad Edwards about the illegal | MR. SCAROLA: Counsel, that's a 21 __ part of the operations at Rothstein? é misrepresentation of what the earlier testimony was. 22 A. Can you reask the question, please? : ] object, no proper predicate. 23 Q. Sure. Sure. i MR. GOLDBERGER: Okay, let's g0 through the a24 Did Russell Adler ever tell you -- Russel] : whole thing again. 25 Adler is your co-conspirator, we've established that. MR. SCAROLA: No, you are not going to go Page 102, Page 104 Pek eore tee * MAUR OAR ET TARE RAM LC ee EE ha I te a Se a a AA EN aN EE ELE EEE ETRE arent ee saRerpanee sy Did Russell Adler in the furtherance of your conspiracy ever tell you he had discussed with Brad Edwards about the illegal activities at RRA? A. No. Q. Now, you testified when asked about whethei asked about whether the press -- if you were involved in asking the press asking the press to run with the Epstein story, you said something to the effect, "the way I was selling the Ponzi scheme it would be overkill.” 1 didn't understand your answer like you didn't understand some of my questions, so I'd like you to kind of tel] me what you meant by that. A. 1 was selling purportedly confidential settlements. Confidentiality was the hallmark of the Ponzi scheme, so too much publicity would have created a problem for me in the sale of what was supposed to bea completely confidential settlement. Q. J think what you are telling me, and] don't want to misstate what I think you are telling me, but is it true that you felt some publicity would be okay but too much would be counter to the purposes of the conspiracy. Js that a fair statement? A. The way J was thinking about it at the time this was going on was that some publicity would assist in establishing for the potential investors that there Page 103 through the whole thing again. Just because we have tolerated two lawyers asking questions, does not mean we are going to tolerate two lawyers asking the same questions. MR. GOLDBERGER: Your objection is noted. BY MR. GOLDBERGER: Q. Okay. So let's talk about your need to use the Epstein case to further your conspiracy. You needed an influx of money, did you not? A. Yes. Q. Okay. You decided to use the Epstein case for that purpose, right? A. Yes. Q. And in order to use the Epstein case, you were going to meet with the investors and pitch the Epstein case with the investors, correct? A. Yes. Q. And in an effort to pitch the case to the investors, you had to have some knowledge of the case, did you not? A. Some level of knowledge, yes, sir. Q. Okay. And in order to gain that knowledge, you spoke to your co-conspirator, Russell Adler; is that correct? A. That's one of the things ] did. DIDO RWNYE Peep hp 4 Oe WNHOF OW DWAIADO BF WHR DW DAAIRAU B® WYNY EE mw HM MH NH LH + canter rea eae ean eee ence at teat m8 IS EG NDE AY PATE RSA CHER UES AMEE TEE UN es 4 Page 105 27 (Pages 102 to 105) FRIEDMAN, LOMBARDI & OLSON 305-371-6677 5ed93085-0554-447f-bcdd-ca2d8fe941 df

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone305-371-6677

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Rothstein Deposition Reveals Use of Jeffrey Epstein Case to Fuel Ponzi Scheme and Possible High‑Profile Name Manipulation

The transcript provides multiple concrete leads: (1) Rothstein admits the firm used the Epstein case to attract investors for a Ponzi scheme; (2) mentions specific high‑profile individuals (Bill Clint Rothstein confirms the Epstein case was leveraged to lure investors into a Ponzi scheme. Reference to a flight manifest allegedly listing Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, used as a sales too Russell A

71p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile...

The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) an Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creati The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contac

84p
House OversightUnknown

Witness alleges use of Epstein case to fund a Ponzi scheme and mentions lawyers Russell Adler and Brad Edwards

Witness alleges use of Epstein case to fund a Ponzi scheme and mentions lawyers Russell Adler and Brad Edwards The passage provides a concrete allegation that a defendant leveraged the high‑profile Epstein case to attract investors for an alleged Ponzi scheme, naming specific lawyers (Russell Adler, Brad Edwards) and suggesting coordination of illegal activity. While the claim is unverified and lacks hard evidence (no transaction details, dates, or amounts), it points to a potentially criminal financial flow involving a notorious case, which merits further investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Witness claims the defendant used the Epstein case as a selling point for a Ponzi scheme.; Names Russell Adler and Brad Edwards as co‑conspirators who discussed illegal activities.; Allegation that fundraisers and private parties were used to attract investors.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Rothstein Deposition Reveals Use of Jeffrey Epstein Case to Fuel Ponzi Scheme and Possible High‑Profile Name Manipulation

Rothstein Deposition Reveals Use of Jeffrey Epstein Case to Fuel Ponzi Scheme and Possible High‑Profile Name Manipulation The transcript provides multiple concrete leads: (1) Rothstein admits the firm used the Epstein case to attract investors for a Ponzi scheme; (2) mentions specific high‑profile individuals (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew) allegedly on flight manifests used to impress investors; (3) identifies Russell Adler, Ken Jenne, and a former federal agent (Cara Holmes) as key conspirators; (4) cites a filed federal complaint on July 24 2009 signed by Brad Edwards, linking him directly to the scheme; (5) details internal surveillance, fund‑raising, and financial commingling practices. These points suggest actionable investigative steps—reviewing the July 24 complaint, tracing the alleged flight manifest, examining financial records for commingled funds, and interviewing the named officials. The involvement of a billionaire, former politicians, and law‑enforcement contacts makes the lead both controversial and potentially explosive. Key insights: Rothstein confirms the Epstein case was leveraged to lure investors into a Ponzi scheme.; Reference to a flight manifest allegedly listing Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew, used as a sales tool.; Russell Adler identified as a co‑conspirator who supplied case details and connections.

1p
House OversightJan 17, 2014

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

1p
House OversightUnknown

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑linked figures) and describe alleged illegal conduct, a non‑prosecution agreement, and possible FBI involvement. It provides specific dates, locations, and payment details that can be pursued for forensic financial tracing and further legal discovery, making it a strong, actionable lead with high public sensitivity. Key insights: Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for Epstein.; The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against him and co‑conspirators, and granted immunity to Maxwell.; FBI agents located Giuffre in Australia in 2011 and de‑briefed her at the U.S. Consulate, indicating law‑enforcement awareness of the network.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.