Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-33464House OversightOther

Subpoena Demands Seek Evidence of Meetings with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on Little Saint James Island

The passage reveals a discovery request that explicitly tries to link high‑profile political figures to the Epstein island, suggesting a possible undisclosed relationship. While the claim is unverifie Defendant’s subpoena request #24 asks for any documents showing meetings with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, The request is tied to a federal action identified as case OS‑SO736‑CIV‑MARRA/JOHNSON. Reference t

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015606
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a discovery request that explicitly tries to link high‑profile political figures to the Epstein island, suggesting a possible undisclosed relationship. While the claim is unverifie Defendant’s subpoena request #24 asks for any documents showing meetings with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, The request is tied to a federal action identified as case OS‑SO736‑CIV‑MARRA/JOHNSON. Reference t

Tags

political-connectiondiscoveryforeign-influenceal-goretipper-gorelegal-filingbill-clintonsubpoenalegal-exposurelittle-saint-jameshouse-oversightmoderate-importanceepstein

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
“goal.” See Toledo v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 30 So. 3d 712 (Fla. 4" DCA 2010) (court of appeal quashing discovery order where party sought law firm client file relating to a different matter holding that “curiosity” about a law firm’s records does not satisfy the relevance requirement and explaining that the contents of the “subpoena is a classic ‘fishing expedition’ and the trial court’s order departs from the essential requirements of the law.”); Calvo v. Calvo, 489 So. 2d 833, 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (quashing subpoena served on wife’s bank for financial records finding them irrelevant: “indeed, the husband has failed to demonstrate what possible relevance the records might have in the proceeding below other than to harass the wife.’”). (emphasis added). Defendant’s incredibly broad and unrelated demands include, for example, Request no. 24: “All documents concerning, relating or referring to your assertions that you met former President Bill Clinton, Former Vice President Al Gore and/or Mary Elizabeth “Tipper” Gore on Little Saint James Island in the U.S. Virgin Islands.” See Exhibit 6, Request no. 24. Whether or not Jane Doe No. 3 met any of these individuals has absolutely nothing to do with the action before this Court. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston, 655 So. 2d 91, 94 (Fla. 2003) (Florida Supreme Court holding that “we do not believe a litigant is entitled carte blanch to irrelevant discovery” and ““It is axiomatic that information sought in discovery must relate to the issues involved in the litigation, 999 as framed in the pleadings.’”) (internal citations omitted). Defendant’s Request demonstrates a blatant example of abuse of the subpoena power. Indeed, the face of many of Defendant’s subpoena demands demonstrate that he is using the subpoena power of this Court to obtain discovery for the federal action. Request nos. 1, 5, 6 and 9 all reference the “federal action” or specifically cite the declaration and case number “OS- SO736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON. Request no. 1, for example, demands: “All documents that reference by name, Alan M. Dershowitz, which support and/or confirm the allegations set forth in Paragraphs 24-31 of your Declaration dated January 19, 2015 and/or Paragraph 49 of your 8

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference
Wire Refreferring

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Seeks to Seal Deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] While Alleging Prior Immunity Deal with Epstein and False Clinton Presence Claims

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz is attempting to keep a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor] confidential, while simultaneously asserting that former President Clinton was not on Epstein’s island an Dershowitz requests the court modify a confidentiality order to use Giuffre’s deposition in his defe The motion cites a former FBI Director’s FOIA finding that President Clinton was not on Little St.

39p
House OversightUnknown

Subpoena Demands Seek Evidence of Meetings with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on Little Saint James Island

Subpoena Demands Seek Evidence of Meetings with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and Tipper Gore on Little Saint James Island The passage reveals a discovery request that explicitly tries to link high‑profile political figures to the Epstein island, suggesting a possible undisclosed relationship. While the claim is unverified and the document is a legal filing about subpoena scope, it provides a concrete lead (request number, names, location, and date of declaration) that could be pursued for corroborating evidence. The controversy is high, but the novelty is moderate because similar allegations have circulated; however, the direct subpoena reference adds investigative value. Key insights: Defendant’s subpoena request #24 asks for any documents showing meetings with Bill Clinton, Al Gore, or Tipper Gore on Little Saint James Island.; The request is tied to a federal action identified as case OS‑SO736‑CIV‑MARRA/JOHNSON.; Reference to a declaration dated January 19, 2015 (Paragraphs 24‑31 and Paragraph 49).

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court

Alan Dershowitz seeks to modify confidentiality order to use [REDACTED - Survivor] deposition in court The filing reveals a procedural move by a high‑profile attorney to access testimony from [REDACTED - Survivor], a key witness in the Epstein‑related allegations. While it connects a well‑known lawyer to the case, it offers no new factual disclosures, financial flows, or direct involvement of senior officials. The lead is moderately useful for tracking litigation strategy but lacks novel or explosive content. Key insights: Dershowitz filed a motion to lift a confidentiality seal on a deposition of [REDACTED - Survivor].; The motion was filed on Feb 3 2016, referencing a Jan 12 2016 confidentiality order.; Dershowitz argues the need to share the testimony with expert witnesses and other parties for his defense.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking ...

The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑li Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for E The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against

47p
House OversightApr 17, 2019

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specific actions (e.g., alleged drafting of the NPA, defamatory statements, settlement confidentiality) and dates that could be pursued for documentary evidence, witness interviews, and financial‑flow analysis. If substantiated, the lead would expose potential prosecutorial misconduct and high‑level collusion, generating major public outrage. Key insights: Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz.; Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded Epstein and co‑conspirators.; Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, approved the NPA; later became Trump’s Secretary of Labor.

1p
House OversightNov 23, 2015

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case

Plaintiffs seek to unseal court filings alleging sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in [REDACTED - Survivor] defamation case The passage reveals a motion to keep certain filings confidential that contain allegations of sexual abuse by a high‑profile attorney, Alan Dershowitz, on behalf of [REDACTED - Survivor]. While it identifies a potential lead—unsealing these records could provide evidence of misconduct—it lacks concrete details such as dates of alleged abuse, financial transactions, or direct links to powerful political figures. The controversy is moderate, and the novelty is limited given the public nature of the Dershowitz‑Giuffre allegations. Key insights: Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell filed a response to Dershowitz’s motion to keep records confidential.; The contested records are three filings that recount [REDACTED - Survivor]’s allegations of sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz.; Plaintiffs argue the filings are not confidential and should be part of the public record in the defamation case.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.