1 duplicate copy in the archive
Epstein’s deposition shows he invoked the Fifth on questions linking him to high‑profile figures and underage sexual activity
The passage lists multiple Fifth‑Amendment refusals by Jeffrey Epstein when asked about socializing with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico gove Epstein refused to answer whether he was with Donald Trump around under‑18 females. He also declined to answer about Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former N He invoked the
Summary
The passage lists multiple Fifth‑Amendment refusals by Jeffrey Epstein when asked about socializing with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico gove Epstein refused to answer whether he was with Donald Trump around under‑18 females. He also declined to answer about Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former N He invoked the
Persons Referenced (4)
“swer the question: “Have you ever socialized-with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?””
David Copperfield“nswer the question: “Did you ever socialize with David Copperfield in the presence of females under the age of 18?””
Alan Dershowitz“swer the question: “Have you ever socialized with Alan Dershowitz im the — of females under the age of 18.” Jd. at”
Jeffrey Epstein“105. In his deposition, Epstein took the Fifth rather than answer the question: “”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure
Epstein’s Fifth‑Amendment Responses Implicate High‑Profile Figures in Underage Socializing Allegations
The passage lists multiple instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about socializing with prominent individuals—including a former president, a high‑profile attorney, a Epstein refused to answer questions linking Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Mottola, David Copperfiel He also declined to answer direct questions about personal sexual abuse of children and solicitati
Epstein’s deposition shows he invoked the Fifth on questions linking him to high‑profile figures and underage sexual activity
Epstein’s deposition shows he invoked the Fifth on questions linking him to high‑profile figures and underage sexual activity The passage lists multiple Fifth‑Amendment refusals by Jeffrey Epstein when asked about socializing with Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico governor/U.S. ambassador in the presence of minors. While the document does not provide direct evidence, the pattern of refusals suggests potential connections between Epstein and powerful individuals that merit further investigative follow‑up (e.g., subpoena records, interview witnesses, review of scheduling logs). The lead is moderately novel—specific deposition citations are not widely reported—and involves high‑profile actors, making it both sensitive and potentially controversial. Key insights: Epstein refused to answer whether he was with Donald Trump around under‑18 females.; He also declined to answer about Alan Dershowitz, Michael Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former New Mexico governor/U.S. ambassador.; He invoked the Fifth on direct abuse allegations and on whether staff scheduled appointments with minors.
Epstein’s Fifth‑Amendment Responses Implicate High‑Profile Figures in Underage Socializing Allegations
Epstein’s Fifth‑Amendment Responses Implicate High‑Profile Figures in Underage Socializing Allegations The passage lists multiple instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about socializing with prominent individuals—including a former president, a high‑profile attorney, a music executive, a magician, and a former governor/U.N. ambassador—in the presence of minors. The specificity of names and the context of alleged underage interaction provide concrete leads for further investigation (e.g., deposition transcripts, subpoenaable records). While the claims are unverified and the excerpt offers no direct evidence of wrongdoing, the involvement of powerful actors and the nature of the questions make the lead both controversial and potentially high‑impact if substantiated. Key insights: Epstein refused to answer questions linking Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Mottola, David Copperfield, and a former governor/U.N. ambassador to underage females.; He also declined to answer direct questions about personal sexual abuse of children and solicitation of prostitution.; The deposition citations (Jd. at 89‑102) provide precise references for locating the testimony.
Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...
The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.