Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-36578House OversightOther

Jeffrey Epstein sexual assault complaint filed in Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM)

The document is a standard civil complaint alleging sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein against a Jane Doe. It confirms jurisdiction and damages sought but provides no new names, transactions, or concre Complaint filed March 5, 2008 in Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM). Plaintiff is a Jane Doe (identified as Jane Doe No.3) alleging sexual assault as a minor. Damages sought exceed

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012644
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The document is a standard civil complaint alleging sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein against a Jane Doe. It confirms jurisdiction and damages sought but provides no new names, transactions, or concre Complaint filed March 5, 2008 in Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM). Plaintiff is a Jane Doe (identified as Jane Doe No.3) alleging sexual assault as a minor. Damages sought exceed

Tags

floridajeffrey-epsteincourt-filingcivil-litigationsexual-assaultlegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
f> anne. « Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Document1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/05/2008 FiUBecpy “WE D.C. ELECTRONIC 7 March 5, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Gear de Mae oy SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ieee amelie CASE NO.: Plaintiff, vs. | JEFFREY EPSTEIN, . | Defendant. COMPLAINT | Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.3 (“Jane” or “Jane Doe”), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows: Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue | 1, Jane Doe is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon her when she was a minor. De Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York. ! 4. This is an action for damages in excess of $50 million. 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (1) exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states. | 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. ] HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P. A. www.hermaniaw.com | 10f6

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80232-KAM
Domainwww.hermaniaw.com

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Allegations of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse scheme involving a college student recruiter in Palm Beach

The passage provides concrete details about a recruitment network (Haley Robson) used by Jeffrey Epstein to obtain underage girls for sexual abuse, including locations, dates, and payment amounts. It Jeffrey Epstein allegedly used a Palm Beach Community College student, [REDACTED - Survivor], to recruit econ Recruitment involved offering $200‑$300 per ‘massage’ session at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion. The

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alleged recruitment of underage girls by a community college student for Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion massages

The passage provides specific names (Ms. Robson, Sarah Kellen) and a detailed modus operandi linking a community college student to the recruitment of underage victims for Jeffrey Epstein. While Epste Ms. Robson, a community college student from Loxahatchee, allegedly recruited underage girls for $20 Sarah Kellen is identified as Epstein’s assistant who processed victims’ personal data and escorte

1p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein involving a teenage massage client and recruiter Ms. Robson

Alleged sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein involving a teenage massage client and recruiter Ms. Robson The passage provides a detailed allegation of Epstein’s sexual assault pattern and mentions a recruiter (Ms. Robson) who was paid for bringing a minor to Epstein. While it offers specific actions, dates (2004‑2005), and a payment amount ($200), it does not connect to high‑ranking officials or large financial flows beyond the small payment, limiting its broader investigative impact. Key insights: Epstein allegedly used a massage‑table setup to assault teenage victims.; Ms. Robson recruited a 16‑year‑old Jane Doe and was compensated by Epstein.; Jane Doe was paid $200 for the encounter.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Allegations of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse scheme involving a college student recruiter in Palm Beach

Allegations of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse scheme involving a college student recruiter in Palm Beach The passage provides concrete details about a recruitment network (Haley Robson) used by Jeffrey Epstein to obtain underage girls for sexual abuse, including locations, dates, and payment amounts. It identifies a specific intermediary and outlines a pattern that could be pursued for further testimony, financial trace, and victim identification. While the core allegations about Epstein are already widely known, the mention of a named recruiter and the operational details constitute a moderately strong, actionable lead. Key insights: Jeffrey Epstein allegedly used a Palm Beach Community College student, [REDACTED - Survivor], to recruit economically disadvantaged minor girls.; Recruitment involved offering $200‑$300 per ‘massage’ session at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion.; The scheme allegedly operated in 2004‑2005 and extended to Florida, New York, and Epstein’s private island.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Jeffrey Epstein sexual assault complaint filed in Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM)

Jeffrey Epstein sexual assault complaint filed in Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM) The document is a standard civil complaint alleging sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein against a Jane Doe. It confirms jurisdiction and damages sought but provides no new names, transactions, or concrete evidence beyond the filing itself, which is already public knowledge. The lead is low‑value for investigation beyond confirming the case exists. Key insights: Complaint filed March 5, 2008 in Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08‑cv‑80232‑KAM).; Plaintiff is a Jane Doe (identified as Jane Doe No.3) alleging sexual assault as a minor.; Damages sought exceed $50 million.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.