Skip to main content
Skip to content
1 duplicate copy in the archive
Case File
d-37477House OversightFinancial Record

Epstein Claims No Pending Lawsuits or Investigations After Non‑Prosecution Agreement

The passage repeats known information about Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and his post‑agreement activities (a personal website and alleged scientific sponsorships). It provides no new n Goldberger states there are no pending civil lawsuits or investigations concerning Epstein. Epstein launched a personal website (JeffreyEpstein-Science.com) featuring blog posts on scientific Claims

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #022128
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage repeats known information about Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and his post‑agreement activities (a personal website and alleged scientific sponsorships). It provides no new n Goldberger states there are no pending civil lawsuits or investigations concerning Epstein. Epstein launched a personal website (JeffreyEpstein-Science.com) featuring blog posts on scientific Claims

Tags

civil-lawsuitsjeffrey-epsteinscientific-sponsorshipreputation-managementfinancial-flownonprosecution-agreementmedia-statementslegal-exposurehouse-oversight

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Fittyy Ricu Goldberger said. “There are no pending civil lawsuits. There are not and should not be any pending investigations, given Mr. Epstein’s complete fulfillment of all the terms of his non-prosecution agreement with the federal government.” If there was an investigation, nothing had come of it yet. For the moment, Epstein was free—free to turn his attention, again, to intellectual pursuits. He launched a website, JeffreyEpstein- CHAPTER 60 Science.com, that featured blog posts such as “Conversations with Jeffrey Epstein,” “The Value of Quantum Computation to Jeffrey Epstein,” “Why Evolutionary Biology Intrigues Jeffrey Epstein,” and “An Understanding of Theoretical Physics from Jeffrey Epstein.” The latter post began: “This is where Jeffrey Epstein takes you to the very cutting edge of the frontiers of knowledge to explore and discuss our basic understanding of the subtle, simple, and hidden [qualities] that lie beneath... our th jail, but he wasn’t done settling universe.” ms. Under the conditions of his f it, he’s even paid for the victims , semed to ensure that he would not -imes. Double jeopardy was work- tly of 2010, reports began to appear” tors were following other leads— child-trafficking charges and a j ‘Jeffrey doesn’t know shit about science,” says Stuart Pivar, the | art collector who has known Epstein for more than three decades. q “Does he like to act like he does? Yes. But he doesn’t. But as far as "these academic scientists —without people like him they wouldn’t have any money.” 4 Other friends of Epstein’s say that he truly did have a bril- ls office refused to comment. It Tiant mind for science. And in any case, Epstein had done more 2ra 4 1 or deny the existence of an onge stein’s lawyers told the Daily B of such an investigation. ‘Tea : with all state and federal requits : than sponsor individual scientists. He'd also sponsored confer- ences on Little Saint Jeff’s. On his website, he announced a con- ference called Mindshift at which Nobel laureates, such as the theoretical physicist Murray Gell-Mann, would mix with sur- » Jat B<ONS, engine j or proceedings in Palm Beach 4 gineers, and futurists and where professors would ia ii

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Domainscience.com

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and Leslie Wexner entangled in alleged $1 Billion extortion scheme linked to Jeffrey Epstein’s network

The document contains multiple specific allegations that connect high‑profile figures – Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and billionaire Leslie Wexner – to a coordinated extortion effort involving a $5 [REDACTED - Survivor]’ lawyers allegedly pressured her to name Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to leverage a Rebecca (Roberts’ friend) allegedly demanded £500,000 from the Prince for access, and claimed the

68p
House OversightSep 28, 2016

Fragmented notes linking Jeffrey Epstein to a $275,000 payout and possible SEC/Bear Stearns connections

Fragmented notes linking Jeffrey Epstein to a $275,000 payout and possible SEC/Bear Stearns connections The passage contains vague, fragmented references to a large payment to Epstein, a possible SEC involvement, and a Bear Stearns employee, but provides no concrete names, dates, or transaction details. The lack of clear context or verifiable leads makes it a low‑value, speculative lead. Key insights: Mentions a $275,000 payment to Epstein and an additional $100,000 bonus.; References the SEC and Bear Stearns in connection with Epstein.; Alludes to a “Ace Greenberg” and a possible aircraft incident involving Epstein.

1p
House OversightUnknown

Epstein Claims No Pending Lawsuits or Investigations After Non‑Prosecution Agreement

Epstein Claims No Pending Lawsuits or Investigations After Non‑Prosecution Agreement The passage repeats known information about Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and his post‑agreement activities (a personal website and alleged scientific sponsorships). It provides no new names, transactions, dates, or concrete leads for further investigation, and only mentions Epstein—a previously heavily reported figure—without linking to current high‑level officials or novel misconduct. Key insights: Goldberger states there are no pending civil lawsuits or investigations concerning Epstein.; Epstein launched a personal website (JeffreyEpstein-Science.com) featuring blog posts on scientific topics.; Claims that Epstein sponsored conferences and interacted with notable scientists, including a mention of Nobel laureate Murray Gell‑Mann.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein’s alleged compliance with non‑prosecution agreement and continued scientific patronage

The passage repeats known claims that Jeffrey Epstein fulfilled a non‑prosecution agreement and mentions his science‑focused website and sponsored conferences. It offers no new concrete evidence, date Claims Epstein met all terms of his federal non‑prosecution agreement. States there are no pending civil lawsuits or investigations. Describes Epstein’s launch of a science‑themed website and sponsor

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightSep 28, 2016

Prince Andrew’s alleged meetings with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell referenced in House Oversight document

Prince Andrew’s alleged meetings with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell referenced in House Oversight document The passage repeats widely reported allegations of Prince Andrew’s connections to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, offering no new specifics, dates, or transactional details. It does suggest possible witness testimony and mentions a “Rodriguez” but provides no actionable leads. The content is moderately sensitive due to the royal involvement but lacks novelty or concrete investigative angles. Key insights: Mentions Prince Andrew attending parties with Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein at Windsor Castle, Sandringham, Saint‑Tropez, and Thailand.; References a person named Rodriguez who was arrested and allegedly involved in handling documents related to the case.; Alludes to a 2015 declaration by a Roberts that may pertain to Epstein’s activities.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.