Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-37936House Oversight

Courtroom transcript excerpt referencing Ms. Giuffre and expert testimony on terminology

Deposition

The passage provides a routine procedural argument about language use in a trial involving Ms. Giuffre. It mentions no new factual allegations, financial flows, or high‑level officials. The only notab Defense expert Dr. Esplin initially described the client as a "prostitute" and later retracted the t Counsel cites Rule 611 and Rule 403 to limit prejudicial language in the trial. Reference to an om

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011323
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.