Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-6792Court Unsealed

court filing: 20-2000X08BAJND Document 838-3

Legal Filing

The document argues that the defendant's motion for a new trial should not be sealed in its entirety, as the common law and First Amendment presume public access to judicial documents. The court notes that limited redactions may be justified for sensitive information, but wholesale sealing is not warranted.

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 20-2000x08bajnd document 838-3
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.