Court Exhibit - Academic Article: 397-1
The article discusses the concept of grooming in child sexual abuse, highlighting the lack of consensus on its definition and measurement. It reviews various definitions and empirical literature on grooming, and proposes future directions for research to establish a clear definition and assessment device. The document is filed as an exhibit in a court case, suggesting its relevance to a specific legal proceeding.
Summary
The article discusses the concept of grooming in child sexual abuse, highlighting the lack of consensus on its definition and measurement. It reviews various definitions and empirical literature on grooming, and proposes future directions for research to establish a clear definition and assessment device. The document is filed as an exhibit in a court case, suggesting its relevance to a specific legal proceeding.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Exhibit A
Exhibit A EFTA00088759 Journal of Child Serial Abuse, 23:957-976, 2014 Copyright te) Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1053-8712 print/1547-0679 online DOI: 10.1080/10538712.2014.960632 11 Routledge Taylor &FrandsGroup The Construct of Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse: Conceptual and Measurement Issues NATALIE BENNETT and WILLIAM O'DONOHUE University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Munk LETA There have been claims that some child molesters engage in a "seduction stage"prior to committing abuse. These behaviors, com- monly known as "grooming," are understood as methods child molesters use to gain access to and prepare future victims to be com- pliant with abuse. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding exactly what this process entails and how it is clearly distinguished from normal adult—child interactions. It is important to devise an accurate definition ofgrooming for scientific, clinical, and forensic purposes. We critically evaluate the various definitions and reveal
Court Exhibit - Academic Article: 452-1
The document is an academic article discussing the concept of grooming in child sexual abuse, its various definitions, and the challenges in measuring it. The authors argue that a clear definition is necessary for both clinical and forensic purposes, and propose future research directions. The article is submitted as an exhibit in a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Journal of all d Sexual Abuse, 23:957-976, 2014
Journal of all d Sexual Abuse, 23:957-976, 2014 Copyright O Taylor & Francis Group, DA: ISSN: 1053-8712 print/1547-0679 online DOI: 10.1080110538712.2014.960632 Routledge The Construct of Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse: Conceptual and Measurement Issues NATALIE BENNETT and WILLIAM O'DONOHUE unktersay of Nevada, Reno, Reno, ,Veividn, 1114 There have been claims that some child molesters engage in a "seduction stage" prior to committing abuse. These behaviors, com- monly known as 'grooming," are understood as methods child molesters use to gain access to andprep arefiaure victims to be com- pliant with abuse. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding exactly what this process entails and how it is clearly distinguished from normal adult-child interactions. It is important to devise an accurate definition of grooming for scientific, clinical, and forensic purposes. We critically evaluate the various definitions and reveal problematic heterogeneity. Furthermore, there
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTIONS IN LIMINE Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York NY Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Chislaine Maxwell EFTA00090721 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A. B. C. D. THIS COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE INTRODUCTION OF ALLEGED CO- CONSPIRATOR STATEMENTS AS A SANCTION FOR GOVERNMENTS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S SEPTEMBER 3, 2021 ORDER 1 The Court's Order was Neither Ambiguous Nor Misread by the Defense 1 The Court Has the Authority to Require Disclosure 2 There Should Be a Sanction 4 There are Substantial Issues with the Government's Anticipated Position 5 II. GOVERNMENT CONCEDEDLY FAILED TO GIVE NOTICE OF THE BASIS OR REASONING TO ADMIT ANY
EFTA00016268
FIADDON
FIADDON MORGAN FOREMAN November 1, 2021 VIA EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Haddon Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. Paglitica 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.com [email protected] Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell through counsel, submit the following summary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C). I. EXPERT DISCLOSURE BY THE DEFENSE A. Dr. Elizabeth Loftus Dr. Loftus is the Distinguished Professor of Psychological Science and Law at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. Dr. Loftus is one of the nation's leading experts on the science of memory. In addition to her experience as an academic and clinical researcher, she has been an expert witness or consultant in hundreds of cases. Her extensive experience and credentials are recited in her curric
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.