Case Filed-7908Court UnsealedCourt Filing - Reply Memorandum: 647
Unknown24p5 persons
Case File
d-7908Court UnsealedCourt Filing - Reply Memorandum: 647
Correspondence
Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys argue that the court's response to a jury note was erroneous and led to a constructive amendment/variance, as the jury was confused about the intent requirement for Count Four. They also argue that the conspiracy counts are multiplicitous because they are based on a single underlying criminal scheme.
Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 647
Pages
24
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available
Loading document viewer...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.