Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-02728757DOJ Data Set 11Other

EFTA02728757

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 11
Reference
efta-02728757
Pages
2
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
t IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 502006CF009454AXXXMB STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER COMES NOW, Witness Y. Doe, by and through undersigned counsel, upon the representation of counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, that he agrees to cancel the deposition of Y. Doe, hereby withdraws her Motion for Protective Order. Dated: April 2, 2008 Respectfully submitted, 09112/2019 HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Witness Y. Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 By: Jeffrey M. Herman [email protected] Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Florida Bar No. 376980 [email protected] Page 74 CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00330109 EFTA 00202835 EFTA02728757 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served by facsimile and U.S. mail on this the 2- day of April, 2008 to: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Lanna Leigh Belohlavek, Esq., State Attorney's Office, 401 N. Dixie Hwy., West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4209. 09112/2019 2 75 CONFIP63ENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00330110 EFTA 00202836 EFTA02728758

Technical Artifacts (9)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

FaxFax: 305-931-0877
Phone2728757
Phone2728758
Phone305-931-0877
Phone305-931-2200
Phone401-4209

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728761

1p
House OversightUnknown

House Oversight Document IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012197

House Oversight Document IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012197 The file contains only a title and no substantive content, providing no leads, names, dates, or allegations to investigate.

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02728846

3p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01387838

Page 3 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139535, * For C.M.A., Consol Plaintiff (9:08cv80119): Jack Patrick Hill, LEAD ATTORNEY, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, West Palm Beach, FL USA; Richard Horace Willits, LEAD ATTORNEY, Richard H Willits PA, Lake Worth, FL USA. For Jane Doe No. 5, Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe No. 3, Consol Plaintiffs (9:08cv80119): Adam D. Horowitz, LEAD ATTORNEY, Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos, Lehrman, P.L., Fort Lauderdale, FL USA; Jeffrey Marc Herman, LEAD AT

1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01387839

1p
House OversightUnknown

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.