Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00022989DOJ Data Set 8Correspondence

EFTA00022989

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 8
Reference
efta-efta00022989
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...

Summary

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From• To• Subject: notes from tic with counsel to Prince Andrew Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:52:05 +0000 - introductions o prosecutors and also two primary FBI agents - may be helpful to start by describing what we're requesting, and then we can answer any questions that we're able to o requesting a voluntary, consensual interview o how does such an interview ordinarily work? • not recorded, not videotaped or audiotaped; instead, agents take notes (and of course counsel can take notes as well) • the interview is not formally under oath, there's no swearing-in, but it is a crime in the U.S. to knowingly lie to federal law enforcement officers o again in terms of process, we do not publicize the content or even the existence of these interviews • obviously can't guarantee that no one who might come to know about the interview would tell the press, but our office does not advise the press of interviews • notably, it was reported months ago that we were attempting to interview Prince Andrew, which was inaccurate, and now we have been working on this request for approximately the past month and there have been no media reports about it o after we've completed an interview, we communicate with counsel as necessary, including with any required follow-up - so that's the process, in terms of the substance o explain target / subject / witness • ordinarily we don't confer a label like that unless asked, but those are the categories o subject matter we are interested in is, broadly, the nature and scope of client's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and his associates, including professional associates, staff, and personal relationships, including Ghislaine Maxwell • how they came to know each other, how long they were in contact, what the nature of their contacts were, how often communicated • for Epstein in particular but also Epstein's associates o then in particular there have been public allegations from at least one individual and we would - able to identify targets? o no, can't identify targets, but ore not saying that their client is a target - expected timeline? o as soon as reasonably practicable (moving the investigation forward expeditiously), and with the goal of covering all relevant subjects in the initial meeting if possible - as matters stand, whether we would say he is a target / witness / subject? o subject, and noting that it is sometimes the case that individuals are a subject by default until there is sufficient information to classify them as a witness arties agreed to be in touch in the coming days EFTA00022989

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01837146

1p
House OversightUnknown

Document references alleged sexual misconduct claims involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell’s post‑Epstein activities, and Prince Andrew

Document references alleged sexual misconduct claims involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell’s post‑Epstein activities, and Prince Andrew The passage strings together several well‑known allegations (Dershowitz, Maxwell, Prince Andrew) but provides no new specifics, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It repeats publicly reported claims and lacks concrete evidence or novel connections, limiting investigative value. Key insights: Mentions a refuted review of sexual misconduct accusations against Alan Dershowitz.; Notes Ghislaine Maxwell’s nonprofit TerraMar Project and prior funding of Seed Media Group by Epstein ($2 M in 2005).; References Maxwell’s attendance at Chelsea Clinton’s 2010 wedding and a 2014 Iditarod participation claim.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Anecdotal recollections linking Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and high‑profile financiers

The passage offers personal impressions and vague connections but provides no concrete evidence, dates, transactions, or actionable leads. It mentions well‑known figures, but only in a speculative, go Author claims to have met Epstein and Maxwell at parties and describes their behavior. Mentions Prince Andrew walking with Epstein and suggests a possible business‑related motive. References financie

2p
House OversightUnknown

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites

Document alleges extensive financial, academic, and sexual ties between Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, and high‑profile figures including Leslie Wexner, Harvard officials, and political elites The passage provides numerous specific allegations – dates, dollar amounts, meetings, and alleged quid‑pro quo arrangements – that could be pursued for evidence of financial flows, abuse of influence, and coordinated legal obstruction. It implicates powerful actors (Wexner, Harvard leadership, a U.S. state attorney, and potentially members of the British royal family) and suggests systematic surveillance and intimidation of investigators. While many claims are unverified and some are repetitive, the level of detail (e.g., $30 M investment, $1 mansion sale, non‑prosecution agreement clause protecting co‑conspirators) makes it a strong investigative lead. Key insights: 1996 meeting on Epstein’s jet linking Dershowitz to Leslie Wexner’s birthday party.; Epstein’s claim that Wexner sold a Manhattan mansion to him for $1.; 1997 $30 M investment in Boston Provident allegedly sourced from Wexner, with half‑million from Dershowitz.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filing alleges Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew forced minor Jane Doe #3 into sexual acts on multiple trips with Epstein

The passage provides specific allegations linking a high‑profile U.S. lawyer and a senior British royal to sexual abuse of a minor, citing locations, travel itineraries, and a formal court pleading. T Alleged sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 by Alan Dershowitz on private planes and in multiple jurisdictio Alleged sexual abuse of Jane Doe #3 by Prince Andrew in London, New York, and on Epstein’s U.S. Vi

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.