From: '
From: ' To: ' " Subject: FW: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Removal Hearing Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:54:36 +0000 FYI. From: [email protected] ced [email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-M USA v. Maxwell Removal Hearing This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CNUECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do
Summary
From: ' To: ' " Subject: FW: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Removal Hearing Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2020 13:54:36 +0000 FYI. From: [email protected] ced [email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-M USA v. Maxwell Removal Hearing This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CNUECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do
Persons Referenced (2)
“...tached Docket Text: Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone: REMOVAL HEARING as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 7/2/2020. The court found the...”
Ghislaine Maxwell“...edings held before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone: REMOVAL HEARING as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 7/2/2020. The court found the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waiv...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (8)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
1:20-MJ-00132-AJ1:20-MJ-00132-Mthusdoj.govusanh.ecfdocketpusdoj.gov[email protected][email protected][email protected]referencedRelated Documents (6)
Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing
From: To: Subject: RE: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:11:14 +0000 Ha you have a moment for a quick call to discuss the court conference? I'm when you have a chance. Thanks! From: Sent: Thursday, July 2, 202012:14 PM To: Subject: FW: Activity in Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing Removal hearing is scheduled for 3:30. From: ecf bounceanhd.uscourts.gov <ecf bounceOnhd.uscourts.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 202012:10 PM To: nefPnhd.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 1:20-n1j-00132-A1 USA v. Maxwell Notice of Hearing This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CMIECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically,
EFTA00024772
EFTA00021837
Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders
Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims that point to actionable investigative leads involving influential actors. The content is primarily a synthesis of known public positions and historical anecdotes, offering limited new information for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn).; Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Amazon, DeepMind).; Mentions historical episodes where AI research intersected with military funding and government secrecy.
EFTA00018663
EFTA01263117
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.