U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse May 20, 2021 Re: United States v. Ohislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated May 17, 2021, which directed the Government to confer with defense counsel and submit proposed redactions to Exhibit C to the defendant's memorandum in support of her supplemental pre-trial motions. (Dkt. No. 284). The Government seeks redactions that are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties referenced in the document. These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Today the Government is submitting to the Court by email its proposed
Summary
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York BY ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse May 20, 2021 Re: United States v. Ohislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to the Court's Order dated May 17, 2021, which directed the Government to confer with defense counsel and submit proposed redactions to Exhibit C to the defendant's memorandum in support of her supplemental pre-trial motions. (Dkt. No. 284). The Government seeks redactions that are narrowly tailored to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties referenced in the document. These proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Today the Government is submitting to the Court by email its proposed
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
referencedRelated Documents (6)
Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content
Empty House Oversight Document Lacks Substantive Content The provided file contains only a title and no substantive text, offering no names, transactions, dates, or allegations to pursue. Consequently, it provides no investigative leads, controversy, novelty, or power linkages. Key insights: Document contains only a header and filename.; No mention of individuals, agencies, or actions.
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Moll° Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 December 17, 2020 BY FEDERAL EXPRESS MDC—Metropolitan Detention Center Legal Department 80 29th Street Brooklyn, NY 11232 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Enclosed is discovery pertinent to the following inmate: • Ghislaine Maxwell: 02879-509 Please allow her access to the materials enclosed. by: Enclosure Very truly yours, AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney Assistant United States Attorneys EFTA00078333
EFTA00031870
EFTA Document EFTA01398793
Subject: RE: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] From: Andrew Gallivan Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 To: Vaishali-P Mehta < Classification: For internal use only Approved. From: Vaishali-P Mehta Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:21 PM To: Andrew Gallivan Subject: FW: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] Classification: For internal use only Hi Andrew, In an effort to ensure that you have to approve only 1 email, I sent the below email, in hindsight I s
Juror Questionnaire: 2020-cv-00000000-JN Document 6423-11 Filed 03/21/22 Page 515 of 830
Juror ID 50 responded to a questionnaire regarding their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror. They indicated no association with the NYPD and no opinion that would make it difficult to be impartial regarding the U.S. Attorney's Office.
GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]
GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.