Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00140670DOJ Data Set 9

so ridiculous lol. that's herjob. that's whAllasks whoever saw the person for the SRA or whatever to do the disciplinary

Other

so ridiculous lol. that's herjob. that's whAllasks whoever saw the person for the SRA or whatever to do the disciplinary report. it seems like the reason he needs the report is because he received an incident report while on SW, or went to SW right after. we always do them in those cases, even for people who are not high care levels or forensics. the issue is a matter of the reported suicidality. all she needs to do is write what he said about the incident, and her opinion about it. if he shows no signs of memory loss or cause for concern, he's competent. she's not making a judgment on whether he's guilty of the infraction. she's just stating whether he's in his right mind to go through the process. isn't this part of her job as a psychologist lol?? or, if she really feels like she doesn't know, then that's what she should say in the report. i feel like we just enable her to skirt around her job and her clinical responsibilities, and i guess we're no19oing to change her at this

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00140670
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.