From: Brad Edwards <
From: Brad Edwards < Subject: Re: Best Date: 9 March 2017 at 16:51:39 GMT To: • Cc: Paul Cassell Pottinger Stan < Sigrid McCawley We should after the hearing today. we will let you know for certain tomorrow. From: Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:23:59 AM To: Brad Edwards Cc: Paul Cassell; Pottinger Stan; Sigrid McCawley Subject: Re: Best Do we have confirmation of 15 May for trial date ? Thanks Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:33 pm, Brad Edwards < > wrote: It is not on your case but is all related to you. The hearing on your case is set for today but it likely going to be postponed for a month since two of the defendants (epstein and groff) just got lawyers and we have not located to serve her yet. I will let you know whether your hearing goes forward though. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, c > wrote: Thanks PAUL Is this for my case? I recall first hearing was today ? Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at
Summary
From: Brad Edwards < Subject: Re: Best Date: 9 March 2017 at 16:51:39 GMT To: • Cc: Paul Cassell Pottinger Stan < Sigrid McCawley We should after the hearing today. we will let you know for certain tomorrow. From: Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2017 11:23:59 AM To: Brad Edwards Cc: Paul Cassell; Pottinger Stan; Sigrid McCawley Subject: Re: Best Do we have confirmation of 15 May for trial date ? Thanks Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:33 pm, Brad Edwards < > wrote: It is not on your case but is all related to you. The hearing on your case is set for today but it likely going to be postponed for a month since two of the defendants (epstein and groff) just got lawyers and we have not located to serve her yet. I will let you know whether your hearing goes forward though. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, c > wrote: Thanks PAUL Is this for my case? I recall first hearing was today ? Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
http://ssrn.com/author=30160Related Documents (6)
List of Pro Hac Vice Counsel for House Oversight Case
The document merely provides names and contact information for attorneys appearing pro hac vice in a House oversight matter. It contains no substantive allegations, transactions, dates, or connections Identifies several high‑profile lawyers (e.g., David Boies, Boies Schiller & Flexner) representing a Specifies pro hac vice status, indicating they are admitted for a specific case in a federal or st
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 92 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 22
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential. He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaig Dershow
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads
Sealed Declaration in Giuffre v. Epstein Motion to Compel Production of Epstein’s Phone Records, Contact List, and Message Pads The filing reveals a court‑ordered request for Epstein’s sealed phone records, contact list, and message pad excerpts, which could contain undisclosed connections to powerful individuals. While the case is already public, the specific documents sought are not, offering a concrete investigative avenue. The lead is moderately controversial and potentially high‑impact if the records expose further elite networks, but it does not yet name top‑level officials directly. Key insights: Plaintiff [REDACTED - Survivor] seeks a court order compelling Jeffrey Epstein to produce phone records, a contact list, and message pad excerpts.; The documents are filed as sealed exhibits, indicating they may contain undisclosed information.; Exhibit 4 references Ghislaine (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting her involvement in the communications.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.