'Sloman, Jeff
From To 'Sloman, Jeff Cc: Subject: Epstein issue with State Attorney's Office Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:16:38 +0000 Importance: Normal It is Tuesday, so there must be a new issue with E stein. This one potentially involves the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office so I included poo on the email chain. Here are the two issues: First, I have heard from several sources that Epstein is trying to convince (or perhaps has already convinced) the SAO to give him "cooperation credit" to shorten the length of his home confinement based upon "cooperation" that he is giving to the Feds in the Bernie Madoff case. As you probably remember, a couple of weeks ago some newspapers reported that Epstein is cooperating with FBI in the Madoff prosecution and that was the real reason for him receiving such a light sentence. After those newspaper reports came out, the AUSA prosecuting the Madoff case called me asking who Epstein was and stating in no uncertain terms that Epstein is not co
Summary
From To 'Sloman, Jeff Cc: Subject: Epstein issue with State Attorney's Office Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:16:38 +0000 Importance: Normal It is Tuesday, so there must be a new issue with E stein. This one potentially involves the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office so I included poo on the email chain. Here are the two issues: First, I have heard from several sources that Epstein is trying to convince (or perhaps has already convinced) the SAO to give him "cooperation credit" to shorten the length of his home confinement based upon "cooperation" that he is giving to the Feds in the Bernie Madoff case. As you probably remember, a couple of weeks ago some newspapers reported that Epstein is cooperating with FBI in the Madoff prosecution and that was the real reason for him receiving such a light sentence. After those newspaper reports came out, the AUSA prosecuting the Madoff case called me asking who Epstein was and stating in no uncertain terms that Epstein is not co
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict
Federal prosecutors allegedly back‑down on Epstein victim notifications after pressure from Epstein’s lawyers, with DOJ officials’ communications revealing internal conflict The passage provides concrete names (Jeffrey Sloman, Acosta, Lefkowitz, Starr) and dates (2008, 2013) showing possible obstruction of victim notifications in the Epstein case, suggesting a lead for investigating DOJ and FBI decision‑making. While it ties high‑level officials, the claim of pressure from Epstein’s attorneys is not yet corroborated, limiting the score to the high‑mid range. Key insights: Jeffrey Sloman, top aide to U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, planned to notify Epstein victims after a plea deal was signed.; Lefkowitz warned Acosta that the office had promised not to contact victims or potential claimants.; Federal prosecutors resumed the FBI investigation and interviewed witnesses in NY and NM while plea negotiations continued.
Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly leaked confidential Epstein prosecution details to NYT reporter
Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein allegedly leaked confidential Epstein prosecution details to NYT reporter The passage suggests possible prosecutorial misconduct and unauthorized media leaks in the Jeffrey Epstein case, providing names, dates, and alleged actions that could be followed up. However, similar allegations have been reported before, limiting novelty and impact. Key insights: Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein discussed confidential prosecution strategy with NYT reporter Landon Thomas.; Weinstein allegedly disclosed specifics about alleged phone luring and interstate travel for underage sex.; Weinstein reportedly warned the reporter not to trust Epstein's defense attorneys and framed the conversation as hypothetical.
Case 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2009 P- e 1 of 7
To: "Gerald Lefcourt" <6
From: To: "Gerald Lefcourt" <6 Cc: "Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS)" Bcc: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:22:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 070910_Epstein_Non-Prosecution_Agreement.pdf Gerry: As per your discussion with U.S. Attorney Acosta, I have attached the Office's written counterproposal. If you have any questions regarding its terms, please do not hesitate to call. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00215324
EFTA Document EFTA01776678
Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.