Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00221703DOJ Data Set 9

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Other

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 67-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 PggigleQff bf 8 703 So.2d 1076 703 So.2d 1076.22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375.23 Fla. L. Weekly D169 (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076) District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. Kimberly BALAS and Teresa Shumate, Petitioners, v. Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re- spondents. No. 97-82. Page 1 307Ak31 k. Relevancy and Materiality. Most Cited Cases Party may be permitted to discover evidence that would be inadmissible at trial, if it would lead to discovery of relevant evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(6)(1). (3) Pretrial Procedure WA 4:=36.1 Oct. 10, 1997. As Mortified on Grant of Clarification Jan. 2, 1998. 307A Pretrial Procedure reY. der.‘e ?" s Se..7-ck 251(o t• 307All Depositions and Discovery Plaintiffs brought action against alleged house of %ann. 307A11(A) Discovery in General prostitution for, inter alia, coercion of prostitution. 307Ak36 Particular Subjects of Disclos u

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00221703
Pages
8
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.