Case File
efta-efta01733292DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceEFTA Document EFTA01733292
Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 10
Reference
efta-efta01733292
Pages
0
Persons
0
Integrity
Loading PDF viewer...
Summary
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From:
jeffrey E. <[email protected]>
Sent:
Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:55 PM
To:
Noam Chomsky
Subject:
Re:
im not sure conveying thoughts i think concepts migh= come first. two things. vs one thing
On Tue, Dec 22= 2015 at 5:34 PM, Noam Chomsky <
> wrote:
=blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:lp= ticcc solid;padding-left:lex">
If I understand you correctly, it bri=gs up some very intriguing questions: is language a system for conveying t=oughts
(mostly internally, to oneself, sometimes externally to others), thoughts that are created by some other systems of
=ind? Or is it a system that actually constructs the thoughts. =f so, then mostly unconsciously and beyond the
possibility of introspectio=. In that latter interpretation, there would be "no sense before language" — except insofar as
=here is thinking of other kinds, which does not involve language. Th=t seems to me at least to be rather plausible,
though how to investigate t=e matters doesn't seem clear.
As far as I can see, the only aspects=of language that could be "reflex" are acquisition and pro=essing of input, which do
seem essentially reflexive — like other kinds of growth and immediate perception.
NOam
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:07 PM
To: Noam Chomsky <
Subject:
> >
instead of a sense making module , is it=possible that language is that module. ? no sense before=language. ?
reflex only?
please no=e
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have
EFTA_R1_00007034
EFTA01733292
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please =ote
The information contained in this communication is confiden=ial, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute
inside informati=n, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the propert= of JEE Unauthorized use,
disclosure or copying of this communica=ion or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If =ou have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediat=ly by return e-mail or by e-mail to
[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@gmail=com> , and destroy this comm=nication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -=11 rights reserved
--089e01229140580b5a05278556cc-- date-last-viewed OM date-received 1450828516 flags 8590195713 gmail-label-ids
23 22 remote-id 572214
2
EFTA_R1_00007035
EFTA01733293
Related Documents (6)
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown
From: Richard Kahn •<
3p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA02068889
1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Noam Chomsky
3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown
From: Lesley Groff
1p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown
EFTA01799964
1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025
Email chain between Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein and Lisa New discussing Poetry in America campaign
The passage contains a routine correspondence about a poetry program and scheduling, with no concrete allegations, financial details, or links to high‑level officials. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein but Jeffrey Epstein is communicating with Lesley Groff and Lisa New about a poetry initiative. Lisa New references a "Templeton campaign" and seeks advice from Epstein. No specific dates, amounts, or ent
1p
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.
Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.