Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Abstract discussion of risk‑adjusted return and behavioral economics
Case File
kaggle-ho-010985House Oversight

Abstract discussion of risk‑adjusted return and behavioral economics

Abstract discussion of risk‑adjusted return and behavioral economics The passage contains no concrete names, transactions, dates, or allegations involving any high‑profile individuals or institutions. It is a theoretical exposition on economic concepts, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Discusses risk‑adjusted return as a maximand, not constant over time; Mentions psychological biases (overoptimism/overpessimism) from behavioral economics literature; Speculates on hypothetical behaviors that might not maximize perceived return

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-010985
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Abstract discussion of risk‑adjusted return and behavioral economics The passage contains no concrete names, transactions, dates, or allegations involving any high‑profile individuals or institutions. It is a theoretical exposition on economic concepts, offering no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Discusses risk‑adjusted return as a maximand, not constant over time; Mentions psychological biases (overoptimism/overpessimism) from behavioral economics literature; Speculates on hypothetical behaviors that might not maximize perceived return

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighteconomicsbehavioral-financetheory

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
The rule does not say that risk-adjusted return tends to hold constant over time. To the contrary. Return equals growth plus cash flow, and my charts show the growth component as a bucking bronco. The maximand rule says only that risk-adjusted return is always the maximand. It is not always the same as time changes circumstances. Proof is in Turgot’s equalization of return at each moment, not from one moment to the next. That is what we see wherever we look. There is a quibble worth attention. Behavior seldom expresses taste exactly. We say one word when we mean another. We reach for the coffee, and accidentally spill it. That was the point of my axiom that predictions converge to outcomes, as well as to one another, only on average. Outcomes are generally a little better or a little worse than predicted. There can even be systematic bias where all people together seem overoptimistic or overpessimistic accordingly to circumstances, as shown in the psychological economics of Hanneman and Tversky. The axiom requires that these biases offset over scale and time. That sounds plausible, and anyhow makes analysis easier. The maximand rule would be ridiculous if terms were defined in a literal market context only. Markets must be defined as wherever any choice is made. It would be ridiculous if cash flow were understood to presuppose literal cash, or even the necessity of some quid pro quo to explain motivations. Unreciprocated gift down the generations drives lineage survival. All behavior means all behavior. The miser maximizes the growth component in return, the parent or philanthropist maximizes the net gift component, and the good-time Charlie maximizes exhaust. Have | gone too far in this claim? Try to imagine an exception. What kind of behavior might not maximize perceived risk-adjusted return? What if I jump out the window? Deliberately drive my car into a tree? Sell a cow for a handful of beans? Maximize a Chapter 3: Foundations 1/11/16 14

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Privileged email chain between attorney Martin G. Weinberg and unknown recipient

Privileged email chain between attorney Martin G. Weinberg and unknown recipient The document contains only standard confidentiality notices and no substantive allegations, names, dates, transactions, or actionable information linking any influential actors to misconduct. It offers no investigative leads. Key insights: Email exchange dated May 29, 2019 between Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. and an address [email protected].; Contains repeated legal disclaimer and confidentiality language.; File name suggests a House oversight matter (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030149) but no details are provided.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01365905

KYC Print Page 10 of 13 DB PWM GLOBAL KYC/NCA: US/LatAm/Int'I PART B elabonship Name SOUTHERN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIP oking Center F NY F NY/Offshore F Offshore IF.skNIGIerate F High Risk Yoonsun Chung (Compliance signature) F DB Employee F DB Managed PIC F DB is Trustee/Co-Trustee F Bearer Shares 4. Attachments A. Type of Photo ID Provided F Drivers License F Passport F National/State ID F Other Checklist of names (individuals and/or entities) that were submitted for database B.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01384899

Richard Kahn I TURK Associates Inc. 575 IA:kink:el Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10022 On Feb 11, 2019, at 6:I& PM, Ilnide-A Sfarana Classification: Confidential Darren and Rich, The password for the NPV document ■ Please let me know if you have any :owes Regards. Deride limp-44n titi Davide Sforrazza Investments & Trading I Institutional Wealth Partners Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Deutsche Bank Wealth Management 345 Park Avenue. 24th Floor Visit us: Sip oimage002.gira IV.1>

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01473151

Subject: Catch-up on Southern Financial [I] From: Todd Stevens ‹ > Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:51:20 -0400 To: Paul Morris Daniel Sabba When: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 4:30 PM-5:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Conference Call Todd and Daniel will dial Paul at cell Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. Classification: For internal use only EFTA01473151

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01394432

iCapital Advisors, LLC GLDUS140 Lawrence Hirsch Form ADV Part 2A investment selection process and it believes its due diligence and investment selection process is thorough, there can be no assurance that the Underlying Funds selected will ultimately be successful. Further, operational due diligence will be limited and will not consist of a full forensic accounting or a detailed review of internal conflicts. Accordingly. there is the risk that iCapital may not detect conflicts of interest

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01279955

OMB Approval No. 2502-0265 Good Faith Estimate (GFE) Name of Originator Fifth Third Joann Brown Mortgage Company Borrower Originator 5001 Kingsley DR Address HD: 1MOCHQ Cincinnati, OH 45227 Propcny Address Ori nator Phone Number Originator Email Date of GFE October 03, 2014 Purpose Shopping for your loan This GFE gives you an estimate of your settlement charges and loan terms if you are approved for this loan. For more information, see HUD's Special Information Booklet on seu

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.