Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Philosophical Treatise on Certainty and Economic Theory
Case File
kaggle-ho-010987House Oversight

Philosophical Treatise on Certainty and Economic Theory

Philosophical Treatise on Certainty and Economic Theory The passage consists of abstract philosophical and economic musings without any concrete names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Discusses logical certitudes and tautologies in economics.; References mathematical concepts and historical proofs (e.g., Fermat's Last Theorem).; Mentions 'pay rule' and human depreciation as theoretical ideas.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-010987
Pages
1
Persons
7
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Philosophical Treatise on Certainty and Economic Theory The passage consists of abstract philosophical and economic musings without any concrete names, transactions, dates, or allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Discusses logical certitudes and tautologies in economics.; References mathematical concepts and historical proofs (e.g., Fermat's Last Theorem).; Mentions 'pay rule' and human depreciation as theoretical ideas.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightphilosophyeconomicstheoryabstract

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Subjective Certitude Tautologies or truisms are logical certitudes. My three fundamental theorems are cases in point. The total return truism is a classical example. Since growth is creation less net outflow, creation is growth plus net outflow. This gives unqualified certitude to the doctrine that output, or creation of value, is growth of value plus cash flow (net outflow of value). The other two fundamental theorems are certitudes in a subjective sense. What they predict infallibly is intentions. The present value rule must give capital value as we see it individually. Only under the convergence axioms does it predict observed market equilibria. The same is true of the maximand rule. This rested on the same axioms and the one that a population acts to satisfy tastes (in the sense of aims). There are schools of thought, including Popperians and deconstructionists, which disapprove of logical certitude on grounds not clear to me. They are wrong. A rose is a rose. Nor are all examples as inane as that one from Gertrude Stein. All of math is derived as logical certitude. Its proof comes from analysis, not experiment. Proof of Fermat’s last theorem eluded some of the finest minds in the world for three centuries until Andrew Wiles published the solution in 1995. Philosophy is precisely a search for hidden truisms or tautologies. Economics is philosophy when it does the same. The pay rule shows that their inferences can be startling. Age-wage profiles are technically illustration, not proof, of the proposition that human depreciation is expected to be recovered in pay. That follows from definitions and needs no evidence in proof. The pay rule is not wholly logical certitude because it also proposes that maintenance consumption is not recovered in pay. Rather I argue that from the biological imperative: maintenance is exhausted in satisfying our taste for adult survival. The fact that few can have doubted this since the physiocrats has nothing to do with proof. The shock, anyhow, is in the expected recovery of human Chapter 3: Foundations 1/11/16 16

Related Documents (6)

House OversightUnknown

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders

Deep Thinking – collection of essays by AI thought leaders The document is a largely philosophical and historical overview of AI research, its thinkers, and societal implications. It contains no concrete allegations, financial transactions, or novel claims that point to actionable investigative leads involving influential actors. The content is primarily a synthesis of known public positions and historical anecdotes, offering limited new information for investigative follow‑up. Key insights: Highlights concerns about AI risk and alignment voiced by prominent researchers (e.g., Stuart Russell, Max Tegmark, Jaan Tallinn).; Notes the growing corporate influence on AI development (e.g., references to Google, Microsoft, Amazon, DeepMind).; Mentions historical episodes where AI research intersected with military funding and government secrecy.

1p
House OversightNov 17, 2018

Chinese Influence & American Interests – Hoover Institution Publication

Chinese Influence & American Interests – Hoover Institution Publication The document contains only a title and publication note with no substantive details, names, transactions, or actionable leads linking powerful actors to any controversy. Key insights: Title suggests a focus on Chinese influence and U.S. interests; Published by the Hoover Institution; No specific individuals, dates, or financial information provided

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alleged Epstein‑Palm Beach trafficking network with links to Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and local officials

The passage provides a detailed, albeit fictionalized, narrative of alleged recruitment, payment, and sexual abuse of under‑age girls by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, including specific names (Wendy Jeffrey Epstein allegedly paid a $90,000 donation to the Palm Beach Police Department for a firearms Wendy Dobbs claims to have recruited under‑age girls (ages 14‑16) and was paid $200 per girl; she

79p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Alfredo Rodriguez’s stolen “golden nugget” – a bound book linking Jeffrey Epstein to dozens of world leaders and billionaires

The passage describes a former Epstein employee, Alfredo Rodriguez, who allegedly stole a bound book containing the names, addresses and phone numbers of high‑profile individuals (e.g., Henry Kissinge Rodriguez claims the book lists names, addresses and phone numbers of dozens of influential individu He tried to sell the book to an undercover FBI agent for $50,000, indicating awareness of its valu

88p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Gordon Getty memoir draft reveals personal history, economic theories, and family legal disputes

The document is a personal memoir and economic treatise by Gordon Getty. It provides anecdotal recollections of his family, Getty Oil, and past lawsuits, but contains no new, unverified allegations of Describes a 1960s house arrest incident in Saudi Arabia involving Getty Oil staff. Mentions a lawsuit between Gordon Getty and his father over a stock dividend, settled without hard f Outlines Getty

228p
House OversightSep 19, 2013

AGI Research Paper by Ben Goertzel et al. – No Evident Investigative Leads

AGI Research Paper by Ben Goertzel et al. – No Evident Investigative Leads The excerpt is merely a citation of an academic paper on artificial general intelligence with no mention of individuals, transactions, or misconduct. It provides no actionable investigative information. Key insights: Document is a technical overview of AGI research.; Authors are Ben Goertzel, Cassio Pennachin, Nil Geisweiller.; Date: September 19, 2013.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.