Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-012129House Oversight

Interview transcript hints at Prince Andrew as a possible source of information

Interview transcript hints at Prince Andrew as a possible source of information The passage only contains a brief reference to Prince Andrew as someone who might 'know a lot of the truth' and could be valuable to the interviewee. No concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads are provided, making it a low‑value, speculative lead. However, it does mention a high‑profile royal figure, giving it modest relevance for further inquiry. Key insights: Interviewee suggests Prince Andrew may have relevant knowledge.; No specific allegations, dates, or financial details are disclosed.; The conversation is part of a House Oversight‑related interview record.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-012129
Pages
1
Persons
10
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Interview transcript hints at Prince Andrew as a possible source of information The passage only contains a brief reference to Prince Andrew as someone who might 'know a lot of the truth' and could be valuable to the interviewee. No concrete details, dates, transactions, or actionable leads are provided, making it a low‑value, speculative lead. However, it does mention a high‑profile royal figure, giving it modest relevance for further inquiry. Key insights: Interviewee suggests Prince Andrew may have relevant knowledge.; No specific allegations, dates, or financial details are disclosed.; The conversation is part of a House Oversight‑related interview record.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightprince-andrewroyal-familyinterview-transcriptpotential-witness

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Edwards adv. Epstein Telephone interview with Virginia Roberts Page 23 of 23 V: Don’t know. JS: Prince Andrew. V: Yes, he would know a lot of the truth. Again, I don’t know how much he would be able to help you with, but seeing he’s in a lot of trouble himself these days, I think he might, so I think he may be valuable. I’m not too sure of him. JS: Ok. Virginia, I think that’s all I have for you. Let me tell you what I would like to do. As I told you in the beginning of this conversation, we’ve been recording it, and hopefully, we’ve got a clear enough recording so that we’ve taken down everything accurately and when it’s transcribed, it will be clear and accurate, but what I would like to do is transcribe it, send it to you, have you take a look at it, and if there’s anything that we got wrong in the statement, you can write back and you can make changes in the transcript so that the transcript is accurate. Is that fair? V: No worries. That is fair. No problem. JS: Alright, great. I really do appreciate that and tell me what the best way is to send the transcript to you. V: Email. If you just want to send it by email or if you want to send it by mail, either or. JS: | Ok. Give me your email address if you would please. a JS: Let me read that back to you: V: Yep that’s it. BE: Thank you Jenna, appreciate it. V: No problem, Brad. JS: | Thank you very very much. Bye Bye now. V: Take care Jack. Nice meeting you. JS: You too. *Redaction has been made at the request of the witness.

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.