Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Kirkland & Ellis letter to Deputy Attorney General urging no federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein
Case File
kaggle-ho-012136House Oversight

Kirkland & Ellis letter to Deputy Attorney General urging no federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis letter to Deputy Attorney General urging no federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document reveals a coordinated legal effort by a top law firm to influence DOJ officials to halt a federal case against Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting possible obstruction or interference. It names specific DOJ officials and outlines a strategy to provide supplemental submissions, which could be a lead for investigating undue influence or collusion, but it lacks concrete evidence of wrongdoing beyond the intent expressed. Key insights: Law firm Kirkland & Ellis is directly lobbying Deputy Attorney General John Roth to stop a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.; The letter references multiple prior communications (May 19, May 27) and a forthcoming packet of four supplemental submissions.; The firm claims there were "irregularities and misconduct" during the federal investigation and plans to rebut a letter from First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-012136
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Kirkland & Ellis letter to Deputy Attorney General urging no federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document reveals a coordinated legal effort by a top law firm to influence DOJ officials to halt a federal case against Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting possible obstruction or interference. It names specific DOJ officials and outlines a strategy to provide supplemental submissions, which could be a lead for investigating undue influence or collusion, but it lacks concrete evidence of wrongdoing beyond the intent expressed. Key insights: Law firm Kirkland & Ellis is directly lobbying Deputy Attorney General John Roth to stop a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.; The letter references multiple prior communications (May 19, May 27) and a forthcoming packet of four supplemental submissions.; The firm claims there were "irregularities and misconduct" during the federal investigation and plans to rebut a letter from First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancejeffrey-epsteinlegal-strategydojlaw-firm-influencepotential-obstruction

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AFFILIATED PARTNERSHIPS 777 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Kenneth W. Starr : To Call Writer Directly: FP Facsimile: www.kirkland.com Dir. Fax: June 19, 2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4115 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we believe that a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. I appreciate your having informed us that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as well as our prior written submissions to CEOS and to the Southern District of Florida. In light of the significant volume of our prior submissions and to facilitate your review, we have drafted four supplemental submissions that will provide a roadmap for your investigation of this matter. Given the bulk of these documents and their appended supporting attachments, you will receive this packet by messenger tomorrow. A brief description of each of the four submissions follows. First, I have included a succinct summary of the facts, law and policy issues at hand. This document sets forth a basic overview of the issues and summarizes our principal contentions as to why federal prosecution of this matter is neither appropriate nor warranted, The three other submissions include: a summary of the irregularities and misconduct that occurred during the federal investigation; a letter from former CEOS attorney Stephanie Thacker that responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “USAO”). Also, for your reference, the package you receive tomorrow will contain a binder including all documentation to which we refer in our submissions. Finally, we will be providing a detailed checklist of each submission or substantive communication to the USAO. Our intention is that you have copies of each such document to enhance your review. If there are any that you have not received from the USAO or CEOS, please advise and we will fedex them to you without delay. Chicago Hong Kong London Munich New York San Francisco Washington, D.C.

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was sig Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked in

85p
House OversightUnknown

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, former President Bill Clinton) that could be pursued for further investigation. It includes specific dates, subpoena details, and names of attorneys, offering concrete leads, but the claims are largely unverified and rely on the law firm’s advocacy, limiting its immediate explosiveness. Key insights: Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Roth.; Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement with Epstein.; Alleges misconduct by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Villafana and Sloman, including alleged self‑dealing and conflict‑of‑interest.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Kirkland & Ellis letter to Deputy Attorney General urging no federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

The document reveals a coordinated legal effort by a top law firm to influence DOJ officials to halt a federal case against Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting possible obstruction or interference. It names s Law firm Kirkland & Ellis is directly lobbying Deputy Attorney General John Roth to stop a federal p The letter references multiple prior communications (May 19, May 27) and a forthcoming packet of f

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Kirkland & Ellis letter to DOJ urging no prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and alleging investigation irregularities

The document hints at possible misconduct or irregularities in the federal investigation of Epstein and references internal DOJ communications, which could be a useful lead for further inquiry. Howeve Law firm Kirkland & Ellis is lobbying the Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jef The letter claims there were "irregularities and misconduct" during the federal investigation. Ref

1p
House OversightUnknown

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Kirkland & Ellis Letter (June 19, 2008) from Kenneth Starr urging DOJ Deputy Attorney General to halt federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein

The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged prosecutorial misconduct, a violated Non‑Prosecution Agreement, and mentions high‑level officials (Deputy Attorney General, Assista Letter dated June 19, 2008 from Kenneth W. Starr (Kirkland & Ellis) to Deputy Attorney General John Claims that the federal grand jury investigation was re‑started in violation of a September 24, 20

7p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.