Deposition exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold shows procedural dispute over break timing

Deposition exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold shows procedural dispute over break timing The passage is a routine courtroom dialogue about taking a break, with no mention of influential actors, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Key insights: Mr. Tein repeatedly orders Mr. Leopold to take a five‑minute break.; The exchange highlights a dispute over deposition timing and record preservation.; No names of high‑profile officials, agencies, or financial details are present.