Deposition excerpt shows repeated questioning about contempt for court

Deposition excerpt shows repeated questioning about contempt for court The passage contains a routine deposition transcript with no specific names, dates, transactions, or concrete allegations linking powerful actors to misconduct. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming a witness's attitude toward a court proceeding, which is already public record and low‑sensitivity. Key insights: Witness repeatedly admits writing a disparaging message about a deposition to a friend.; Attorney Mr. Tein persistently asks the same question despite objections.; No mention of high‑profile individuals, financial flows, or foreign influence.