Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing

Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing The passage records a procedural disagreement about marking exhibits during a deposition. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or substantive allegations of misconduct, offering only a minor lead about internal procedural friction. Key insights: Mr. Leopold threatens court sanctions if exhibits are removed unmarked.; Mr. Tein disputes the claim that exhibits are unmarked.; Mr. Goldberger references long‑standing practice without prior disputes.