Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
kaggle-ho-013112House Oversight

Technical discussion of cognitive development stages and inference mechanisms in AI research

Technical discussion of cognitive development stages and inference mechanisms in AI research The passage is a purely academic description of AI inference models and Piagetian stages, with no mention of influential individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or controversial actions. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Describes infantile stage inference using short inference chains.; Mentions concrete operational stage with more complex reasoning.; References CogPrime framework and PLN backward-chainer.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-013112
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Technical discussion of cognitive development stages and inference mechanisms in AI research The passage is a purely academic description of AI inference models and Piagetian stages, with no mention of influential individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or controversial actions. It offers no actionable investigative leads. Key insights: Describes infantile stage inference using short inference chains.; Mentions concrete operational stage with more complex reasoning.; References CogPrime framework and PLN backward-chainer.

Tags

kagglehouse-oversightaicognitive-scienceinferencepiaget

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
196 11 Stages of Cognitive Development Stage 1: Infantile Inference Rules a % i Knowledge about New I World _ Knowledge | . Inference Control Strategy | Fig. 11.4: Uncertain Inference in the Infantile Stage word-object associations: e.g. learning that when the word “ball” is uttered in various contexts (“Get me the ball,” “That’s a nice ball,” etc.) it generally refers to a certain type of object. The key point regarding these “infantile” inference problems, from the CogPrime perspective, is that assuming one provides the inference system with an appropriate set of perceptual and motor ConceptNodes and SchemaNodes, the chains of inference involved are short. They involve about a dozen inferences, and this means that the search tree of possible PLN inference rules walked by the PLN backward-chainer is relatively shallow. Sophisticated inference control is not required: standard AI heuristics are sufficient. In short, textbook narrow-AI reasoning methods, utilized with appropriate uncertainty-savvy truth value formulas and coupled with appropriate representations of perceptual and motor inputs and outputs, correspond roughly to Piaget’s infantile stage of cognition. The simplistic approach of these narrow-AI methods may be viewed as a method of creating building blocks for subsequent, more sophisticated heuristics. In our theory Piaget’s preoperational phase appears as transitional between the infantile and concrete operational phases. 11.4.2 The Concrete Stage At this stage, the mind is able to carry out more complex chains of reasoning regarding the world, via using inference control schemata that adapt behavior based on experience (reasoning about a given case in a manner similar to prior cases). In the concrete operational stage (Figure 11.5), an entity is able to carry out more complex chains of reasoning about the world. Inference control schemata which adapt behavior based on experience, using experientially learned heuristics (including those learned in the prior stage), are applied to both analysis of and interaction with the sensory surround / world. Concrete Operational stage tasks include:

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.