Sworn deposition links Jeffrey Epstein’s associate Jean‑Luc Brunel’s modeling agency to underage girls, $1 M investment and alleged trafficking payments
Sworn deposition links Jeffrey Epstein’s associate Jean‑Luc Brunel’s modeling agency to underage girls, $1 M investment and alleged trafficking payments The passage provides specific, verifiable details – a 2010 sworn deposition, a $1 M investment by Epstein, dates (2003‑2006), addresses, and alleged $100,000 assignments – that could be pursued for financial records, visa applications, and FBI files. It implicates high‑profile figures (Epstein, Brunel, Les Wexner) and a foreign‑model supply chain, making it a strong investigative lead, though many claims remain uncorroborated. Key insights: Vasquez’s 2010 deposition states Epstein invested $1 M in Brunel’s agency MC2 and that she handled its finances from 2003‑2006.; MC2 recruited 200‑300 underage models from South America, Europe and the former Soviet Union for Epstein’s New York, Palm Beach and Caribbean properties.; Models as young as 13‑15 were housed at 301 E. 66th St., a building allegedly owned by Epstein, with rent waived but $1,000 monthly charges by Brunel.
Summary
Sworn deposition links Jeffrey Epstein’s associate Jean‑Luc Brunel’s modeling agency to underage girls, $1 M investment and alleged trafficking payments The passage provides specific, verifiable details – a 2010 sworn deposition, a $1 M investment by Epstein, dates (2003‑2006), addresses, and alleged $100,000 assignments – that could be pursued for financial records, visa applications, and FBI files. It implicates high‑profile figures (Epstein, Brunel, Les Wexner) and a foreign‑model supply chain, making it a strong investigative lead, though many claims remain uncorroborated. Key insights: Vasquez’s 2010 deposition states Epstein invested $1 M in Brunel’s agency MC2 and that she handled its finances from 2003‑2006.; MC2 recruited 200‑300 underage models from South America, Europe and the former Soviet Union for Epstein’s New York, Palm Beach and Caribbean properties.; Models as young as 13‑15 were housed at 301 E. 66th St., a building allegedly owned by Epstein, with rent waived but $1,000 monthly charges by Brunel.
Persons Referenced (16)
“go have sex with this man [whichever acquaintance Epstein designated],’” she said. Roberts’ story about th”
Jean-Luc Brunel“a bookkeeper for Mc2, owned by Epstein associate Jean-Luc Brunel. He employed scouts in South America, Europe and”
Edward Jay Epstein“go have sex with this man [whichever acquaintance Epstein designated],’” she said. Roberts’ story about th”
Ilan Epstein“go have sex with this man [whichever acquaintance Epstein designated],’” she said. Roberts’ story about th”
Wafic Said“whichever acquaintance Epstein designated],’” she said. Roberts’ story about the modeling agency is sup”
Larry Page“rey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald Page 6 of 17 Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/”
Unit Manager“course of my work as a scouter or model agencies manager.” Too old at 19 In 2003, when Roberts turned 19”
Maritza Vasquez“ee, by the sworn statement of a Miami woman named Maritza Vasquez, who was later interviewed in New York by an FBI”
Les Wexner“ed them from overseas. Epstein, who was close to Les Wexner, the owner of Victoria’s Secret, often talked abo”
Leah Jean“a bookkeeper for Mc2, owned by Epstein associate Jean-Luc Brunel. He employed scouts in South America,”
Larry VisoskiJeffrey Epstein“Even from jail, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald Page 6 of 1”
Estate Manager“course of my work as a scouter or model agencies manager.” Too old at 19 In 2003, when Roberts turned 19”
Abigail Wexner“hem from overseas. Epstein, who was close to Les Wexner, the owner of Victoria’s Secret, often talked abo”
Mark Epstein“go have sex with this man [whichever acquaintance Epstein designated],’” she said. Roberts’ story about th”
Gensler Company“though the agency employed 200 to 300 models, the company didn’t make any money and Brunel was always broke”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse
Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure
Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...
The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema
[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures
Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
FBI‑linked testimony reveals Epstein’s $1 M investment in Jean‑Luc Brunel’s MC2 model‑scouting firm and under‑age girls placed in luxury NYC apartments
FBI‑linked testimony reveals Epstein’s $1 M investment in Jean‑Luc Brunel’s MC2 model‑scouting firm and under‑age girls placed in luxury NYC apartments The passage provides concrete details – dates (2003‑2006), amounts ($1 M investment, $1,000 monthly rent, $100 k assignments), locations (301 E. 66th St., Palm Beach, Caribbean island) and named actors (Jeffrey Epstein, Jean‑Luc Brunel, Les Wexner, FBI agents, bookkeeper Maritza Vasquez). These are actionable leads for financial‑flow and trafficking investigations, and they tie a powerful financier to a network that includes a major retail billionaire and a foreign‑model‑scouting operation. While many elements have been reported, the specific financial transaction and the FBI interview with Vasquez are less widely documented, giving the lead moderate novelty and high investigative usefulness. The sensitivity is high due to the involvement of a billionaire and potential criminal liability for a former model‑agency owner. Key insights: Vasquez’s 2010 sworn deposition states Epstein invested $1 M in Brunel’s MC2 agency.; From 2003‑2006 Vasquez handled all finances and payroll for MC2, including a bank transaction linked to Epstein.; Under‑age models (13‑15) were housed in a luxury NYC apartment at 301 E 66th St., allegedly owned by Epstein.
FBI‑linked testimony reveals Epstein’s $1 M investment in Jean‑Luc Brunel’s MC2 model‑scouting firm and under‑age girls placed in luxury NYC apartm...
The passage provides concrete details – dates (2003‑2006), amounts ($1 M investment, $1,000 monthly rent, $100 k assignments), locations (301 E. 66th St., Palm Beach, Caribbean island) and named actor Vasquez’s 2010 sworn deposition states Epstein invested $1 M in Brunel’s MC2 agency. From 2003‑2006 Vasquez handled all finances and payroll for MC2, including a bank transaction linked Under‑age mod
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.