Witness refuses to answer speculative questions in House Oversight hearing

Witness refuses to answer speculative questions in House Oversight hearing The passage provides a routine procedural exchange about attorney‑client privilege and speculative questioning. It mentions a judge (Judge Marra) and a witness, but offers no concrete allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. The lead is low‑value and largely procedural. Key insights: Witness cites attorney‑client privilege as reason for non‑response.; Mr. Simpson attempts to compel answer and moves to strike as non‑responsive.; Judge Marra is referenced as the presiding judge for the case.