Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00085213DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 52 (Ex Parte) Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 52 (Ex Parte) Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 Submitted Ex Pane and Under Seal By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to update the Court on the status of United States v. Noel, I 9-cr-830 (AT), and to explain the basis for the Government's request, submitted contemporaneously by public letter motion, to extend the deadlines for t

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00085213
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 52 (Ex Parte) Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 Submitted Ex Pane and Under Seal By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to update the Court on the status of United States v. Noel, I 9-cr-830 (AT), and to explain the basis for the Government's request, submitted contemporaneously by public letter motion, to extend the deadlines for t

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 52 (Ex Parte) Filed 04/28/21 Page 1 of 2 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York 86 Chambers Street New York, New York 10007 April 28, 2021 Submitted Ex Pane and Under Seal By ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 Re: The New York Times Co. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) Dear Judge Engelmayer: This Office represents defendant the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") in this Freedom of Information Act ("FOR"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, action brought by plaintiff the New York Times Company (the "Times") seeking the release of certain records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I write respectfully to update the Court on the status of United States v. Noel, I 9-cr-830 (AT), and to explain the basis for the Government's request, submitted contemporaneously by public letter motion, to extend the deadlines for the parties to submit a proposed schedule for the production of remaining documents and for the Government to produce remaining documents. Today, this Office preliminarily approved and submitted to Pretrial Services for its review deferred prosecution agreements covering both of the defendants in Noel. Before the agreements can be finalized, Pretrial Services must accept the defendants for supervision pursuant to the proposed agreements and conduct a Pretrial Services investigation in advance of doing so. Pretrial Services has indicated that this process will be completed within forty-five days, although this Office is seeking to expedite Pretrial Services's review. Following Pretrial Services's review, the defendants must review and accept the final agreements. In the event Pretrial Services is able to expedite its review, the Government estimates that approximately one month remains before any final deferred prosecution agreements could be submitted to Judge Torres and publicly disclosed, including to the Times. The Government understands that its proposed schedule is not as expeditious as the Court initially ordered, but believes there is an increasing likelihood that Noel will resolve shortly. The Government's present request is intended to conserve the resources of the Government and the Court with respect to the Government's reliance on Exemption 7(A) on the basis of the Noel prosecution. The Government has made and will continue to make best efforts to process records in connection with its reliance on other exemptions and Exemption 7(A) on the basis of United States v. Tartaglione, I 6-cr-832 (KMK). The Government also intends to precisely mark out its reliance on Exemption 7(A) on the basis of the Noel prosecution in its upcoming production of documents withheld in full or in part under Exemption 7(A) on the basis of Tartaglione. EFTA00085213 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 52 (Ex Parte) Filed 04/28/21 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 Because of the sensitive and confidential nature of this Office's efforts to resolve Noel, the Government respectfully requests that this letter be filed ex parte and under seal and that it remain under seal until Noel is resolved. I thank the Court for its consideration of this submission. Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney By: Steven J. Kochevar Steven J. Kochevar Assistant United States Attorney 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, NY 10007 Telephone: (914) 993-1928 Email: [email protected] EFTA00085214

Technical Artifacts (3)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #1:20-CV-00833-PAE
Phone(914) 993-1928

Related Documents (6)

Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01398793

Subject: RE: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] From: Andrew Gallivan Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 To: Vaishali-P Mehta < Classification: For internal use only Approved. From: Vaishali-P Mehta Sent: Friday, April 07, 2017 2:21 PM To: Andrew Gallivan Subject: FW: MD approval for ACUs completed for High Risk Clients [I] Classification: For internal use only Hi Andrew, In an effort to ensure that you have to approve only 1 email, I sent the below email, in hindsight I s

43p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00028741

0p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031870

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00031532

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.