Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008 Pavpitok6 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FILED by VT D.C. ELECTRONIC ebruary 6, 2008 CLARENCE MADDOX CLERK U.S. 01ST. CE. S.D. OF ILA. • MIAMI CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Jane Doe No. 2 is a citizen and resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and is sui juris. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a minor. 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York. 4. This is an action for damages in excess of 550 million. 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the cla
Summary
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008 Pavpitok6 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FILED by VT D.C. ELECTRONIC ebruary 6, 2008 CLARENCE MADDOX CLERK U.S. 01ST. CE. S.D. OF ILA. • MIAMI CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Jane Doe No. 2 is a citizen and resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and is sui juris. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a minor. 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York. 4. This is an action for damages in excess of 550 million. 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the cla
Persons Referenced (3)
“... Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931- By: Jeffrey M. Herman jherman@,hermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] Fl...”
Stuart S. Mermelstein“...05-931- By: Jeffrey M. Herman jherman@,hermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Florida Bar No. 376980 aho...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008 Pavpitok6 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against...”
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (8)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
9:08-CV-80119-KAMwww.hermanlaw.com[email protected][email protected](305) 931.2200305-931-2200CONTRACTreflectedRelated Documents (6)
Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case
Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex‑parte communications, and leaks to the press—while naming senior DOJ officials (Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Marie Villafana and Jeffrey Sloman) and linking the case to former President Bill Clinton’s notoriety. These allegations, if substantiated, could expose abuse of prosecutorial discretion, potential violations of DOJ ethics rules, and political influence, making it a strong investigative lead. However, much of the material is defensive in nature and repeats known procedural complaints, limiting its novelty and concrete evidentiary hooks. Key insights: Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was signed (July 1 2008 subpoena).; Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked information to reporter Landon Thomas.; Accusations that Villafana attempted to appoint a personal friend of her live‑in boyfriend as attorney‑representative for victims, suggesting a conflict of interest.
EFTA Document EFTA01660024
EFTA Document EFTA01355632
• C) O 0 Z Z Page 20 OO mm z z r• > r- -o C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Jane Doe No 6 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 6 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80994 FILING DATE: 9/10/2008 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra. K
EFTA02729648
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 12 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/20/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions. Introduction This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 2. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly EFTA00221641 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
EFTA Document EFTA01381997
• C) O 0 Z -n Page 20 OO mm z z r• > r- mo C *** THIS DATA IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY*" Copyright © 2011 CourtLink Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -n o SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ?) (West Palm Beach) Jane Doe No 6 v. Epstein cp PLAINTIFF: Jane Doe No 6 CD DEFENDANT: Epstein, Jeffrey AMICUS: United States of America WITNESS: Jean Luc Bruhnel Material DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 9:08cv80994 FILING DATE: 9/10/2008 JURISDICTION: Federal Question JUDGE: Marra.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.