Defense argues Prince Andrew hearsay cannot be admitted in defamation case

Defense argues Prince Andrew hearsay cannot be admitted in defamation case The passage reveals a procedural argument to exclude a triple‑hearsay statement attributed to Prince Andrew, indicating ongoing litigation that could expose the royal to defamation claims. While it identifies a high‑profile figure, it lacks concrete details on alleged misconduct, financial flows, or dates, limiting immediate investigative value but offering a moderate lead for further document review. Key insights: Defense seeks to block admission of a triple‑hearsay document citing Prince Andrew's alleged statements.; Reference to the Minemyer case suggests precedent against admitting reporter testimony without cross‑examination.; Argument that each party is responsible for its own defamation, potentially limiting liability for Prince Andrew.