Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-14963House OversightOther

Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case

The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing. He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing Virginia The dispute c

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015632
Pages
1
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing. He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing Virginia The dispute c

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincourt-confidentialitylegal-filingsconfidential-court-recordsalan-dershowitzlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightsexual-abuse-allegationssexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 12 of 20 Scarola) and Dershowitz’s extended answer are quoted in full— including Dershowitz’s reference to the oral sex allegation that he now argues this Court should treat as “confidential”: Q. [Y]ou [are] aware that years before December of 2014, when the CVRA pleading was filed, that your name had come up repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors, correct? . . . A. Let me answer that question. I am aware that never before 2014, end of December, was it ever, ever alleged that I had acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, that Ihad ever been with her. I was completely aware ofthat. There had never been any allegation. She claims under oath that she told you that secretly in 2011, but you have produced no notes of any such conversation. You, of course, are a witness to this allegation and will be deposed asa witness to this allegation. I believe it is an entirely false allegation that she told you in 2011 that she had had any sexual contact with me. I think she’s lying through her teeth when she says that. And I doubt that your notes will reveal any such information. But if she did tell you that, she would be absolutely, categorically lying. So I am completely aware that never, until the lies were put in a legal pleading at the end of December 2014, it was never alleged that I had any sexual contact with [REDACTED]. I know that it was alleged that I was a witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. | was never a witness to any of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse. And I wrote that to you, something that you have falsely denied. And I stand on the record. The record is clear that I have categorically denied I was ever a witness to any abuse, that | ever saw Jeffrey Epstein abusing anybody. And -- and the very idea that I would stand and talk to Jeffrey Epstein while he was receiving oral sex from [REDACTED], which she swore to under oath, is so outrageous, so preposterous, that even David Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS. McCAWLEY: I object. I object. I'm not going to allow you to reveal any conversations that happened in the context of a settlement discussion. THE WITNESS: Does she have standing?

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedMay 26, 2021

Dershowitz v. Netflix - Original Petition

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ------------------------------------------------------------------------x ALAN DERSHOWITZ, | Civil Action No. | Plaintiff, | | -against - | | NETFLIX, INC., LEROY & MORTON | PRODUCTIONS LLC, RADICALMEDIA LLC, | LISA BRYANT and JOSEPH BERLINGER, | | Defendants. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------x COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Alan Dershowitz (hereinafter, “Professor Dershowitz”)

39p
Court UnsealedMay 26, 2021

Dershowitz complaint

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ------------------------------------------------------------------------x ALAN DERSHOWITZ, | Civil Action No. | Plaintiff, | | -against - | | NETFLIX, INC., LEROY & MORTON | PRODUCTIONS LLC, RADICALMEDIA LLC, | LISA BRYANT and JOSEPH BERLINGER, | | Defendants. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------x COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Alan Dershowitz (hereinafter, “Professor Dershowitz”)

41p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 38774829 E-Filed 03/08/2016 07:20:19 PM

54p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑p Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on a He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, s

76p
Court UnsealedMay 28, 2021

Dershowitz Lawsuit Against Netflix

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ------------------------------------------------------------------------x ALAN DERSHOWITZ, | Civil Action No. | Plaintiff, | | -against - | | NETFLIX, INC., LEROY & MORTON | PRODUCTIONS LLC, RADICALMEDIA LLC, | LISA BRYANT and JOSEPH BERLINGER, | | Defendants. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------x COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Alan Dershowitz (hereinafter, “Professor Dershowitz”)

39p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and Leslie Wexner entangled in alleged $1 Billion extortion scheme linked to Jeffrey Epstein’s network

The document contains multiple specific allegations that connect high‑profile figures – Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, and billionaire Leslie Wexner – to a coordinated extortion effort involving a $5 [REDACTED - Survivor]’ lawyers allegedly pressured her to name Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to leverage a Rebecca (Roberts’ friend) allegedly demanded £500,000 from the Prince for access, and claimed the

68p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.