Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case
Summary
Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies a potential witness (Virginia Giuffre) and references a legal filing (CVRA pleading) from December 2014, offering concrete leads—names, dates, and a court motion—that could be pursued for further discovery. The controversy is high given the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and the Epstein scandal, but the claim is already widely reported, limiting novelty. Key insights: Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing.; He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing Virginia Giuffre.; The dispute centers on a CVRA pleading filed at the end of December 2014.
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Related Documents (6)
Deposition excerpt mentioning Virginia Roberts, sex‑trafficking allegations and Alan Dershowitz
The text is a largely unintelligible deposition transcript with vague references to a sex‑trafficking case involving a minor named Virginia Roberts and mentions of Alan Dershowitz. It provides no conc Witness references a December 30th source about a sex‑trafficking organization. Virginia Roberts is named as a victim/minor in the alleged trafficking network. Alan Dershowitz is mentioned in the con
Deposition reveals repeated privilege objections to questions about Virginia Roberts' allegations against Professor Alan Dershowitz and possible co...
The transcript shows attorneys repeatedly invoking common‑interest and attorney‑client privilege to block inquiries about whether anyone disclosed Roberts' allegations to Bob Josefsberg. While it does Multiple objections cite common‑interest privilege, indicating the parties consider the matter sensi Questions focus on whether anyone told the witness that Roberts' allegations were discussed with B
Deposition excerpt reveals Alan Dershowitz on call‑in line during testimony about Epstein‑related abuse allegations
The passage documents a live deposition where Alan Dershowitz was identified on a call‑in line, discussing a comment about moving on and denying knowledge of abuse allegations involving Jeffrey Epstei Alan Dershowitz was the only identified participant on a call‑in line during a deposition on 10/20/2 Witness questioned the presence of an unidentified party and the possibility of a muted participan
Deposition excerpts reference Boies, Dershowitz, and Virginia Roberts sexual misconduct allegations amid privilege objections
The passage hints at possible coordination among high‑profile lawyers (David Boies, Ted Olson) and a sexual misconduct claim involving Virginia Roberts and Professor Alan Dershowitz. It raises questio Witness was asked about discussions with David Boies regarding the credibility of Virginia Roberts. Reference to former Prime Minister "Barak" (likely Netanyahu) and a question about Boies’ involveme
Draft transcript excerpt mentions Jeffrey Epstein invoking the Fifth and a reference to Alan Dershowitz
The passage provides a vague, uncited reference to Epstein and Dershowitz refusing to answer questions in a hearing. It lacks concrete details—no dates, transactions, or specific allegations—making it Jeffrey Epstein allegedly took the Fifth Amendment during a court hearing. A question about Alan Dershowitz was raised, and he also invoked the Fifth. The excerpt is labeled as a rough draft and appe
Deposition testimony suggests flight logs do not show Alan Dershowitz on same plane as Virginia Roberts, but witness hints at possible tampering am...
The passage provides a concrete lead – a sworn witness (identified as Mr. Cassell) reviewed flight logs and confirmed no entries linking Alan Dershowitz and Virginia Roberts, while also suggesting the Witness confirms no flight‑log entry showing Dershowitz and Roberts together. Witness raises possibility that logs were changed or are incomplete. Testimony links the logs to an alleged international
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.