Skip to main content
Skip to content

Duplicate Document

This document appears to be a copy. The original version is:

Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case
Case File
kaggle-ho-015632House Oversight

Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case

Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies a potential witness ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and references a legal filing (CVRA pleading) from December 2014, offering concrete leads—names, dates, and a court motion—that could be pursued for further discovery. The controversy is high given the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and the Epstein scandal, but the claim is already widely reported, limiting novelty. Key insights: Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing.; He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing [REDACTED - Survivor].; The dispute centers on a CVRA pleading filed at the end of December 2014.

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
kaggle-ho-015632
Pages
1
Persons
15
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies a potential witness ([REDACTED - Survivor]) and references a legal filing (CVRA pleading) from December 2014, offering concrete leads—names, dates, and a court motion—that could be pursued for further discovery. The controversy is high given the involvement of a high‑profile attorney and the Epstein scandal, but the claim is already widely reported, limiting novelty. Key insights: Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing.; He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing [REDACTED - Survivor].; The dispute centers on a CVRA pleading filed at the end of December 2014.

Persons Referenced (15)

Paula Epstein

at it was alleged that I was a witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. | was never a

Jane Does

context of a settlement discussion. THE WITNESS: Does she have standing? HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015632

Sigrid McCawley

Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS. McCAWLEY: I object. I object. I'm not going to allow you t

Edward Jay Epstein

at it was alleged that I was a witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. | was never a

Jack Scarola

e Confidentiality of Court Records Page 12 of 20 Scarola) and Dershowitz’s extended answer are quoted in f

Ilan Epstein

at it was alleged that I was a witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. | was never a

Wafic Said

utrageous, so preposterous, that even David Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS. McCAWLEY: I

Larry Page

ion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 12 of 20 Scarola) and Dershowitz’s extended answ

Bradley Edwards

Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards

Virginia Giuffre

any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, t

David Boies

ath, is so outrageous, so preposterous, that even David Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS. McCAWL

Scotty David

ath, is so outrageous, so preposterous, that even David Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS.

Alan Dershowitz

Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells R

Jeffrey Epstein

ur name had come up repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors, correct? . . . A. Let me answ

Mark Epstein

at it was alleged that I was a witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. | was never a

Tags

kagglehouse-oversighthigh-importancejeffrey-epsteinalan-dershowitzcourt-confidentialitysexual-abuse-allegationslegal-filings

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards and Cassells Response to Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records Page 12 of 20 Scarola) and Dershowitz’s extended answer are quoted in full— including Dershowitz’s reference to the oral sex allegation that he now argues this Court should treat as “confidential”: Q. [Y]ou [are] aware that years before December of 2014, when the CVRA pleading was filed, that your name had come up repeatedly in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors, correct? . . . A. Let me answer that question. I am aware that never before 2014, end of December, was it ever, ever alleged that I had acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, that Ihad ever been with her. I was completely aware ofthat. There had never been any allegation. She claims under oath that she told you that secretly in 2011, but you have produced no notes of any such conversation. You, of course, are a witness to this allegation and will be deposed asa witness to this allegation. I believe it is an entirely false allegation that she told you in 2011 that she had had any sexual contact with me. I think she’s lying through her teeth when she says that. And I doubt that your notes will reveal any such information. But if she did tell you that, she would be absolutely, categorically lying. So I am completely aware that never, until the lies were put in a legal pleading at the end of December 2014, it was never alleged that I had any sexual contact with Virginia Roberts. I know that it was alleged that I was a witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. | was never a witness to any of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse. And I wrote that to you, something that you have falsely denied. And I stand on the record. The record is clear that I have categorically denied I was ever a witness to any abuse, that | ever saw Jeffrey Epstein abusing anybody. And -- and the very idea that I would stand and talk to Jeffrey Epstein while he was receiving oral sex from Virginia Roberts, which she swore to under oath, is so outrageous, so preposterous, that even David Boies said he couldn’t believe it was true. MS. McCAWLEY: I object. I object. I'm not going to allow you to reveal any conversations that happened in the context of a settlement discussion. THE WITNESS: Does she have standing?

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz claims oral‑sex allegation against him is confidential in Edwards v. Dershowitz case

The passage reveals a disputed claim that Alan Dershowitz was named in connection with Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors and that an oral‑sex allegation is being treated as confidential. It identifies Dershowitz is seeking to keep an oral‑sex allegation confidential in a court filing. He denies any knowledge of or witness to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse, specifically referencing Virginia The dispute c

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition of Prof. Paul Cassell alleges Alan Dershowitz’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein sex‑trafficking and possible concealment of evidence

The transcript contains multiple specific allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network, references to flight logs, a ‘black book’, a non‑p Cassell claims the pleading alleges Dershowitz abused [REDACTED - Survivor] and “other minors” based on a He asserts that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when questioned about Dershowitz, s

76p
House OversightMar 20, 2017

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz

Court filings reveal alleged links between Jeffrey Epstein’s sex‑trafficking network and high‑profile figures including Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz The documents contain multiple sworn statements, media excerpts, and court orders that reference alleged sexual encounters between [REDACTED - Survivor] (Jane Doe 3) and Prince Andrew, as well as accusations against Alan Dershowitz. While many of the claims have been publicly reported, the filing includes sealed exhibits and specific procedural motions (Rule 21/15) that could provide new evidentiary leads, such as the referenced sealed documents and the alleged list of other powerful individuals (politicians, business executives, foreign leaders). The presence of a judge’s order striking certain allegations and the detailed procedural history suggest actionable avenues for further discovery and verification. Key insights: Exhibits list media articles linking Prince Andrew and Dershowitz to alleged sexual abuse of a minor.; Court order strikes detailed allegations but preserves the right of Jane Doe 3 to reassert them with proper evidence.; Reference to a “list of numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well‑known Prime Minister, and other world leaders” in the Rule 21 motion.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

[REDACTED - Survivor] v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
House OversightApr 9, 2019

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads

Empty Exhibit Provides No Investigative Leads The document contains only a title and no substantive content, offering no names, dates, transactions, or allegations to pursue. It lacks any actionable information, controversy, novelty, or linkage to powerful actors. Key insights: Document consists solely of a header and exhibit label.; No factual statements, allegations, or references to individuals or entities are present.

1p
House OversightUnknown

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up

[REDACTED - Survivor] testimony and filings implicate Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in alleged sex‑trafficking and possible NPA cover‑up The document combines a sworn complaint, detailed deposition excerpts, and internal communications that directly name high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. President‑linked figures) and describe alleged illegal conduct, a non‑prosecution agreement, and possible FBI involvement. It provides specific dates, locations, and payment details that can be pursued for forensic financial tracing and further legal discovery, making it a strong, actionable lead with high public sensitivity. Key insights: Giuffre alleges Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz were among the men she was forced to service for Epstein.; The complaint states Epstein’s 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) barred federal charges against him and co‑conspirators, and granted immunity to Maxwell.; FBI agents located Giuffre in Australia in 2011 and de‑briefed her at the U.S. Consulate, indicating law‑enforcement awareness of the network.

1p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.