The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, disclosing two expert witnesses:...
Summary
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, disclosing two expert witnesses: Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who will testify on the science of memory, and Dr. Park Dietz, a forensic psychiatrist. Their testimonies may challenge the credibility of witnesses and the prosecution's case.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, disclosing two expert witnesses:...
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, disclosing two expert witnesses: Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologist specializing in memory science, and Dr. Park Dietz, a psychiatrist with expertise in forensic psychiatry. The experts are expected to testify on topics such as the reliability of memories and the interpretation of certain behaviors.
This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, fe...
This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, featuring testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on human memory and false memories, and Dr. Park Dietz on psychiatry and behavioral science. The experts are expected to challenge the prosecution's evidence and expert opinions.
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghisla...
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing to preclude certain expert testimonies from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus based on the Daubert standard and other legal precedents. The government contests various aspects of the proposed testimonies, including opinions on hindsight bias, false memory formation, and witness credibility. The memorandum aims to exclude or limit the defense's expert witnesses' testimonies.
This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude ex...
This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude expert testimony from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus in her criminal case. The document argues for the admissibility of their testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, citing relevant case law and the experts' qualifications. The defense contends that the experts' testimony is crucial for understanding issues like hindsight bias, the halo effect, and the psychology of false allegations.
The document is a court filing by the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, disclosing two expert w...
The document is a court filing by the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, disclosing two expert witnesses: Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who will testify on human memory and false memories, and Dr. Park Dietz, who will testify on psychiatry and behavioral science. The experts' testimonies may challenge the prosecution's case and provide alternative explanations for the alleged crimes.
Court Filing: 406
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where both parties present their positions on scheduling Daubert and Rule 412 hearings, and discuss issues related to expert testimony and disclosure.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.