NLRB Defends Authority to Issue Notice‑Posting Rule Under NLRA
Summary
The passage outlines legal arguments about the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking authority. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or foreign influence, and the con Board cites Chevron and Supreme Court precedent to justify notice‑posting rule. Comments from industry groups (Texas Association for Home Care & Hospice, Independent Bakers Associa Member Hayes (NLRB
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
NLRB Board Defends Proposed Notice‑Posting Enforcement Scheme Amid Dissent
The passage discusses internal NLRB rulemaking debates over notice‑posting requirements and alleged punitive sanctions. It mentions a dissenting board member but does not identify any high‑level offic Board rejects authority to impose fines for notice‑posting failures. Proposed enforcement includes tolling of Section 10(b) and inference of unlawful motive. Union groups (SEIU, UFCW) comment on pote
NLRB Defends Notice‑Posting Requirement Against First Amendment and NLRA Challenges
The passage outlines legal arguments and case law supporting the National Labor Relations Board's authority to require employers to post government‑provided labor‑rights notices. It contains no new al The NLRB cites Supreme Court precedent to assert implied authority to preempt state action. Multiple labor‑policy groups argue the posting rule violates the First Amendment and NLRA Section 8( The Bo
Critique of NLRB Notice‑Posting Rulemaking Process
The passage merely debates the evidentiary basis for a Labor Board rule and references standard administrative authorities. It does not identify new financial flows, misconduct, or direct involvement The NLRB’s proposed mandatory notice‑posting rule is challenged as lacking substantial evidence. Cited studies and anecdotes are deemed insufficient to prove employee ignorance of NLRA rights. The a
Federal Register discussion of NLNL notice‑posting rule and its legal justification
The passage is a routine regulatory analysis of a labor‑law notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑profile officials or entities Reference to Pilchak attorneys proposing changes to the notice rule. Citations of court cases (UAW v. Chao, Brown, etc.) supporting agency authority. Discussion of historical unionization rates and t
NLRB proposes and finalizes rule requiring NLRA notice postings in workplaces
The passage details routine rulemaking by the National Labor Relations Board on posting employee rights notices. It contains no allegations of misconduct, financial flows, or involvement of high‑level Executive Order 13496 (2009) mandates posting NLRA rights for federal contractors. NLRB proposed and finalized a rule making notice posting an unfair labor practice if not complied wi The rule faced
NLRB Notice Posting Rule Debate Shows Mixed Public Comments on Employee Awareness of NLRA Rights
The passage records public comments on a proposed NLRB rule requiring workplace posting of NLRA rights. It contains no concrete leads about wrongdoing, financial flows, or high‑level officials. The on Comments are split: some claim workers already know union rights, others say they are largely unawar Employers and industry groups argue the rule is unnecessary and costly. Union and worker advocates
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.