NLRB Board Defends Proposed Notice‑Posting Enforcement Scheme Amid Dissent
Summary
The passage discusses internal NLRB rulemaking debates over notice‑posting requirements and alleged punitive sanctions. It mentions a dissenting board member but does not identify any high‑level offic Board rejects authority to impose fines for notice‑posting failures. Proposed enforcement includes tolling of Section 10(b) and inference of unlawful motive. Union groups (SEIU, UFCW) comment on pote
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
NLRB Defends Authority to Issue Notice‑Posting Rule Under NLRA
The passage outlines legal arguments about the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking authority. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or foreign influence, and the con Board cites Chevron and Supreme Court precedent to justify notice‑posting rule. Comments from industry groups (Texas Association for Home Care & Hospice, Independent Bakers Associa Member Hayes (NLRB
Critique of NLRB Notice‑Posting Rulemaking Process
The passage merely debates the evidentiary basis for a Labor Board rule and references standard administrative authorities. It does not identify new financial flows, misconduct, or direct involvement The NLRB’s proposed mandatory notice‑posting rule is challenged as lacking substantial evidence. Cited studies and anecdotes are deemed insufficient to prove employee ignorance of NLRA rights. The a
Federal Register discussion of NLNL notice‑posting rule and its legal justification
The passage is a routine regulatory analysis of a labor‑law notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑profile officials or entities Reference to Pilchak attorneys proposing changes to the notice rule. Citations of court cases (UAW v. Chao, Brown, etc.) supporting agency authority. Discussion of historical unionization rates and t
Dissenting Opinion Challenges NLRB's Authority to Impose Workplace Notice‑Posting Rule
The passage is a legal dissent arguing that the National Labor Relations Board lacks statutory authority to require employers to post notices of employee rights. It contains no new allegations of misc Claims the NLRA does not grant the Board authority to mandate notice posting. Cites historical statutes (RLA, Title VII, FMLA, OSHA) that include explicit posting requirements. Contrasts the NLRB rul
NLRB Defends Notice‑Posting Requirement Against First Amendment and NLRA Challenges
The passage outlines legal arguments and case law supporting the National Labor Relations Board's authority to require employers to post government‑provided labor‑rights notices. It contains no new al The NLRB cites Supreme Court precedent to assert implied authority to preempt state action. Multiple labor‑policy groups argue the posting rule violates the First Amendment and NLRA Section 8( The Bo
NLRB Final Rule Requiring Employers to Post NLRA Employee Rights Notices
The document details the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking process for a notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial transactions, or undisclosed relationships Rule mandates all NLRA‑covered employers to post a standardized notice of employee rights in the wor Failure to post may be treated as an unfair labor practice and could toll the 6‑month filing perio
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.