Federal Register discussion of NLNL notice‑posting rule and its legal justification
Summary
The passage is a routine regulatory analysis of a labor‑law notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial flows, or misconduct involving high‑profile officials or entities Reference to Pilchak attorneys proposing changes to the notice rule. Citations of court cases (UAW v. Chao, Brown, etc.) supporting agency authority. Discussion of historical unionization rates and t
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
NLRB proposes and finalizes rule requiring NLRA notice postings in workplaces
The passage details routine rulemaking by the National Labor Relations Board on posting employee rights notices. It contains no allegations of misconduct, financial flows, or involvement of high‑level Executive Order 13496 (2009) mandates posting NLRA rights for federal contractors. NLRB proposed and finalized a rule making notice posting an unfair labor practice if not complied wi The rule faced
NLRB Defends Authority to Issue Notice‑Posting Rule Under NLRA
The passage outlines legal arguments about the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking authority. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or foreign influence, and the con Board cites Chevron and Supreme Court precedent to justify notice‑posting rule. Comments from industry groups (Texas Association for Home Care & Hospice, Independent Bakers Associa Member Hayes (NLRB
NLRB Board Defends Proposed Notice‑Posting Enforcement Scheme Amid Dissent
The passage discusses internal NLRB rulemaking debates over notice‑posting requirements and alleged punitive sanctions. It mentions a dissenting board member but does not identify any high‑level offic Board rejects authority to impose fines for notice‑posting failures. Proposed enforcement includes tolling of Section 10(b) and inference of unlawful motive. Union groups (SEIU, UFCW) comment on pote
NLRB Defends Notice‑Posting Requirement Against First Amendment and NLRA Challenges
The passage outlines legal arguments and case law supporting the National Labor Relations Board's authority to require employers to post government‑provided labor‑rights notices. It contains no new al The NLRB cites Supreme Court precedent to assert implied authority to preempt state action. Multiple labor‑policy groups argue the posting rule violates the First Amendment and NLRA Section 8( The Bo
NLRB Justifies Notice-Posting Rule Under NLRA Authority
The passage is a legal justification for a rulemaking action by the National Labor Relations Board, containing no specific allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑profile individuals or a Cites statutory authority under NLRA Section 6 for rulemaking. References case law (Barnette, Chevron) to support deference to agency interpretation. Discusses the necessity of employee awareness for
NLRB Final Rule Requiring Employers to Post NLRA Employee Rights Notices
The document details the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking process for a notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial transactions, or undisclosed relationships Rule mandates all NLRA‑covered employers to post a standardized notice of employee rights in the wor Failure to post may be treated as an unfair labor practice and could toll the 6‑month filing perio
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.