Dissenting Opinion Challenges NLRB's Authority to Impose Workplace Notice‑Posting Rule
Summary
The passage is a legal dissent arguing that the National Labor Relations Board lacks statutory authority to require employers to post notices of employee rights. It contains no new allegations of misc Claims the NLRA does not grant the Board authority to mandate notice posting. Cites historical statutes (RLA, Title VII, FMLA, OSHA) that include explicit posting requirements. Contrasts the NLRB rul
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
NLRB argues employer's failure to post required notice constitutes unfair labor practice under NLRA Section 8(a)(1)
The passage discusses legal interpretations of notice‑posting requirements under the National Labor Relations Act. It does not identify specific high‑profile individuals, corporations, or financial tr NLRB asserts that failure to post required labor‑law notices can be deemed an unfair labor practice. Cites Supreme Court precedent allowing the Board flexibility in interpreting Section 8(a)(1). Refe
NLRB Defends Authority to Issue Notice‑Posting Rule Under NLRA
The passage outlines legal arguments about the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking authority. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or foreign influence, and the con Board cites Chevron and Supreme Court precedent to justify notice‑posting rule. Comments from industry groups (Texas Association for Home Care & Hospice, Independent Bakers Associa Member Hayes (NLRB
NLRB Board Defends Proposed Notice‑Posting Enforcement Scheme Amid Dissent
The passage discusses internal NLRB rulemaking debates over notice‑posting requirements and alleged punitive sanctions. It mentions a dissenting board member but does not identify any high‑level offic Board rejects authority to impose fines for notice‑posting failures. Proposed enforcement includes tolling of Section 10(b) and inference of unlawful motive. Union groups (SEIU, UFCW) comment on pote
NLRB Final Rule Requiring Employers to Post NLRA Employee Rights Notices
The document details the National Labor Relations Board's rulemaking process for a notice‑posting requirement. It contains no specific allegations, financial transactions, or undisclosed relationships Rule mandates all NLRA‑covered employers to post a standardized notice of employee rights in the wor Failure to post may be treated as an unfair labor practice and could toll the 6‑month filing perio
NLRB Notice Posting Rule and Statute of Limitations Tolling Discussion
The passage outlines procedural debates over NLRB notice‑posting requirements and equitable tolling of the NLRA statute of limitations. It mentions industry groups and legal precedents but does not id Board proposes discretion for General Counsel on notice‑posting violations. Industry groups (Michigan Health & Hospital Association, Heritage Foundation, California Chamber) lo Discussion of tolling
Court analysis challenges NLRB's authority to require employer posting of NLRA rights
The passage is a legal argument about statutory interpretation and agency authority. It does not identify specific individuals, financial transactions, or misconduct, nor does it link powerful actors Questions whether the NLRB can use Section 6 of the NLRA to mandate continuous posting of employee r Cites Supreme Court precedents (Chevron, Local 357, Teamsters v. NLRB) to argue limits on agency g
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.