Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-32210House OversightOther

Court discussion on business record exception and admissibility of witness statements

The passage merely outlines a procedural debate over evidentiary rules (Rule 803(6)) and mentions low‑profile individuals (Ms. McCawley, Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Pagliuca). It provides no concrete leads on fi Debate over whether documents qualify under Rule 803(6) business record exception. Ms. McCawley seeks to introduce 87 pages of anonymous witness statements. Mr. Pagliuca argues that hearsay portions

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011432
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The passage merely outlines a procedural debate over evidentiary rules (Rule 803(6)) and mentions low‑profile individuals (Ms. McCawley, Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Pagliuca). It provides no concrete leads on fi Debate over whether documents qualify under Rule 803(6) business record exception. Ms. McCawley seeks to introduce 87 pages of anonymous witness statements. Mr. Pagliuca argues that hearsay portions

Tags

evidencelegal-strategyhearsaylegal-exposurehouse-oversightbusiness-record-exceptioncourt-proceedings

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 129 H3vlgiu2 is all about. There is trustworthiness when someone, you know -- if it was a billing record of mine, that's a different story. But the business record exception, 803(6), everyone in the chain of the hearsay link has to be under a business duty to report. So there are cases where officers are allowed to testify about things that they wrote in their report because they observed them or another officer told them or it was a test that maybe happened within the police department. But what they're not allowed to talk about, under a business record exception, are witness statements. And that's what Ms. McCawley wants to try to introduce to the jury in this case -- 87 pages of witness statements from people who we don't know who they are and there's no evidence that they had any association with Ms. Maxwell. Let me finish with this state of mind issue. TH] Gl COURT: But before you do, why isn't it an 803 (6) exception? MR. PAGLIUCA: It could be, your Honor. So 803 (6). —- lial |e COURT: Okay. So what you're saying is, yes, the reports could get in, but not the hearsay part. MR. PAGLIUCA: Exactly. That's exactly right. LE ir] COURT: Well, okay. Of course what the plaintiff would say to that is, okay, fine. MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, then you're redacting 90 percent -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone(212) 805-0300

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.