Court discussion on business record exception and admissibility of witness statements
The passage merely outlines a procedural debate over evidentiary rules (Rule 803(6)) and mentions low‑profile individuals (Ms. McCawley, Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Pagliuca). It provides no concrete leads on fi Debate over whether documents qualify under Rule 803(6) business record exception. Ms. McCawley seeks to introduce 87 pages of anonymous witness statements. Mr. Pagliuca argues that hearsay portions
Summary
The passage merely outlines a procedural debate over evidentiary rules (Rule 803(6)) and mentions low‑profile individuals (Ms. McCawley, Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Pagliuca). It provides no concrete leads on fi Debate over whether documents qualify under Rule 803(6) business record exception. Ms. McCawley seeks to introduce 87 pages of anonymous witness statements. Mr. Pagliuca argues that hearsay portions
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Technical Artifacts (1)
View in Artifacts BrowserEmail addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.
(212) 805-0300Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.