Court discussion on business record exception and admissibility of witness statements

Court discussion on business record exception and admissibility of witness statements The passage merely outlines a procedural debate over evidentiary rules (Rule 803(6)) and mentions low‑profile individuals (Ms. McCawley, Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Pagliuca). It provides no concrete leads on financial flows, misconduct, or powerful actors, limiting its investigative usefulness. Key insights: Debate over whether documents qualify under Rule 803(6) business record exception.; Ms. McCawley seeks to introduce 87 pages of anonymous witness statements.; Mr. Pagliuca argues that hearsay portions are not admissible.