Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
d-33946House OversightOther

Defendant Alan Dershowitz seeks subpoena of Jane Doe #3 in Florida defamation case, allegedly to target a sexual‑trafficking victim

The filing hints at possible intimidation of a trafficking victim by a high‑profile attorney, suggesting a misuse of legal process. While it names a well‑known figure (Alan Dershowitz) and raises conc Alan Dershowitz is the defendant seeking a subpoena of a non‑party identified only as Jane Doe #3. The motion claims the subpoena is unrelated to the underlying defamation suit and is intended to int

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #015599
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

The filing hints at possible intimidation of a trafficking victim by a high‑profile attorney, suggesting a misuse of legal process. While it names a well‑known figure (Alan Dershowitz) and raises conc Alan Dershowitz is the defendant seeking a subpoena of a non‑party identified only as Jane Doe #3. The motion claims the subpoena is unrelated to the underlying defamation suit and is intended to int

Tags

sexual-traffickingpotential-intimidationlegal-abusedefamationcivil-proceduresubpoenalegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Filing # 25919336 E-Filed 04/09/2015 05:23:25 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 171! JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs, V. ALAN DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. MOTION TO QUASH OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SUBPOENA SERVED ON NON-PARTY JANE DOE NO. 3 Non-party Jane Doe 3, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.410(c)(1)', hereby moves for an order quashing the subpoena duces tecum served on her by Defendant, or alternatively, pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280(c) for issuance of a protective order sharply limiting the scope of the subpoena. INTRODUCTION This Court should quash the subpoena issued to non-party Jane Doe No. 3 as it is unreasonable and oppressive. The Defendant is abusing the subpoena power in an effort to intimidate, harass and cause undue burden to a non-party. Indeed, Defendant - just days ago - publicly admitted that his goal of deposing Jane Doe No. 3 has nothing to do with this Florida Defamation Action; rather, he is trying to find a way to send this victim of sexual trafficking to “Jail.” “She was hiding in Colorado...but we found her and she will have to be deposed. The end * For the limited purpose of the Motion to Quash or for Protective Order and resolving the scope of the subpoena and any enforcement issues, Jane Doe No. 3 voluntarily submits herself to this Court’s jurisdiction.

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Phone5919336

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 37201585 E-Filed 01/29/2016 03:47:44 PM

25p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Filing # 33747975 E-Filed 10/27/2015 04:45:57 PM

91p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Filing # 31897743 E-Filed 09/10/2015 12:44:35 PM

66p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01368193

Page 20 of 32 The motion claimed that the woman. who was not identified in court documents, had sexual relations as a minor with Prince Andrew in London. New York and on Mr. Epstein's private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Mr. Epstein told the woman to give the prince 'Whatever he demanded" and 'report back to him on the details? the motion said. Buckingham Palace took the unusual step of issuing a statement to rebut the accusations "This relates to longstanding and ongoing civil procee

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz’s Unproduced ‘Absolute Proof’ Documents and Media Claims in Epstein‑Related Defamation Litigation

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz repeatedly asserted on national TV that he possessed travel, credit‑card and other records proving he never met Jane Doe #3, yet has failed to produce any such Dershowitz claimed on Fox Business (Jan 7 2015) and CNN (Jan 5 2015) to have "all kinds of records" Despite a 45‑day deadline, he produced no documents and responded only with boilerplate objections

26p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.