Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing with unclear references
Summary
The passage contains fragmented dialogue with no concrete allegations, dates, transactions, or substantive connections to high‑profile officials or wrongdoing. It mentions only two unnamed individuals The excerpt appears to be from a hearing transcript (House Oversight, Dec 4, 2007). Names mentioned: Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold. Reference to an Exhibit 20‑01 and a picture involving a father, stepm
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Fragmented transcript from House Oversight hearing with unclear references to a person named Jeff and a massage
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue fragments lacking clear names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations. It provides no actionable leads, novel information, or connections to high‑r Mentions a person named Jeff and a massage context References a Mr. Leopold and a Mr. Tein Appears to be from a House Oversight hearing transcript dated 01/24/23
Transcript excerpt showing vague deposition scheduling and attorney-client privilege references
The passage provides only a fragmented courtroom/house oversight interview with minor, unnamed individuals (Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Tein). It lacks concrete details on transactions, dates, or Witness mentions meeting with Mr. Leopold to prepare for a deposition. Mr. Leopold allegedly could not attend due to a court appearance. Reference to an email from Mr. Leopold to Mr. Goldberger.
Deposition excerpt referencing a $50‑million lawsuit filed by Mr. Herman and attorney‑client privilege objections
The passage provides a vague reference to a high‑value lawsuit ($50 million) filed by an individual named Mr. Herman, but offers no concrete details about the parties, the nature of the claim, or any Mr. Herman filed a $50‑million lawsuit on behalf of an unnamed client. The deposition includes repeated attorney‑client privilege objections by Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The excerpt suggests a press
Privileged Discussion Over Potential $50M Lawsuit Against Jeffrey Epstein
The excerpt hints at a lawsuit filed by an individual named Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein for $50 million, but provides no concrete details such as filing dates, co Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion is framed as privileged, limiting disclosure of details. The witness and questioning attorney re
Witness refuses to confirm Leopold's $50M lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein citing privilege
The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to
Transcript excerpt showing heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage contains only a brief, uncited dialogue with no names of high‑profile officials, no financial or misconduct details, and no actionable leads. It offers no novel or controversial informatio Shows a tense interaction between two participants in a House Oversight hearing No substantive allegations, dates, transactions, or policy issues are mentioned
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.