The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant...
Summary
The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant, conversations about a juror's identity, and the team's response to new information about the juror. The testimony reveals details about the team's actions and potential inconsistencies in their statements.
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Ms. Brune testifies that she saw certain emails before filing a July 21st letter and had knowledge o...
Ms. Brune testifies that she saw certain emails before filing a July 21st letter and had knowledge of the July 15th conference call transcript. She disagrees that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the Court were incorrect.
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Brune is being questioned about her knowledge...
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Brune is being questioned about her knowledge and actions regarding a significant piece of information. She testifies that she did not initially consider it significant and did not immediately contact the court, but had the resources and team to investigate further if she had deemed it necessary.
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OK...
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OKULA clarifies that the government did not conduct an independent investigation after receiving a note, as they deemed it innocuous, and corrects Ms. Brune's speculation about the government's knowledge and actions.
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she discusses her convers...
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she discusses her conversations with defense counsel and the receipt of a jury note. She testifies that she had conversations with co-counsel after receiving a copy of a letter and that the communications were joint defense communications. The witness also mentions being upset upon reading the jury note and verifying information on the Bar website.
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about h...
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about her knowledge of Ms. Trzaskoma's potential attorney suspension and the actions taken by her team during the eight-day jury deliberation period.
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential ...
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.