MS. BRUNE
witness being deposed
Mentioned in 53 documents. Roles: witness being deposed, previous witness, Witness in the USA v. Maxwell trial, witness being questioned, Colleague who discussed the content of the brief with the witness
MS. BRUNE is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
10 sources for document mentions
deposition transcript: 1616620
“The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant”
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 68 of 130
“Ms. Brune testifies that she saw certain emails before filing a July 21st letter and had knowledge o”
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 56 of 130
“The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Brune is being questioned about her knowledge”
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
“The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of certain facts and the drafting of a legal b”
Court filings and deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338
“The document contains excerpts from court filings and a deposition transcript in Ghislaine Maxwell's”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 169 documents”
Known Connections (26)
Document Mentions (64)
The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant...
The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant, conversations about a juror's identity, and the team's response to new information about the juror. The testimony reveals details about the team's actions and potential inconsistencies in their statements.
Ms. Brune testifies that she saw certain emails before filing a July 21st letter and had knowledge o...
Ms. Brune testifies that she saw certain emails before filing a July 21st letter and had knowledge of the July 15th conference call transcript. She disagrees that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the Court were incorrect.
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Brune is being questioned about her knowledge...
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Brune is being questioned about her knowledge and actions regarding a significant piece of information. She testifies that she did not initially consider it significant and did not immediately contact the court, but had the resources and team to investigate further if she had deemed it necessary.
The document contains excerpts from court filings and a deposition transcript in Ghislaine Maxwell's...
The document contains excerpts from court filings and a deposition transcript in Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal case, discussing topics such as the media's portrayal of Maxwell, witness testimony, and jury selection. The deposition focuses on Ms. Brune's testimony about her involvement in the case and interactions with other lawyers.
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OK...
The document is a court transcript of a redirect examination of witness Ms. Brune. Prosecutor MR. OKULA clarifies that the government did not conduct an independent investigation after receiving a note, as they deemed it innocuous, and corrects Ms. Brune's speculation about the government's knowledge and actions.
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she discusses her convers...
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she discusses her conversations with defense counsel and the receipt of a jury note. She testifies that she had conversations with co-counsel after receiving a copy of a letter and that the communications were joint defense communications. The witness also mentions being upset upon reading the jury note and verifying information on the Bar website.
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about h...
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about her knowledge of Ms. Trzaskoma's potential attorney suspension and the actions taken by her team during the eight-day jury deliberation period.
Ms. Brune testifies about a brief she wrote, admitting it missed an important issue and did not accu...
Ms. Brune testifies about a brief she wrote, admitting it missed an important issue and did not accurately represent the timeline of an investigation. She also acknowledges that her colleague, Ms. Trzaskoma, was aware of the investigation but it was not accurately reflected in the brief.
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential ...
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
deposition transcript: 1616620
The document is a deposition transcript of Ms. Brune, discussing the team's use of a jury consultant, conversations about a juror's identity, and the team's response to new information about the juror. The testimony reveals details about the team's actions and potential inconsistencies in their statements.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
Court filings and transcripts: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
The document contains a collection of court filings and transcripts related to the USA v. Maxwell trial. It includes an email from reporters opposing secret jury selection and excerpts from a witness testimony discussing the jury selection process. Additionally, it contains a timeline of key events for a Crime Victims' Rights Act analysis.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 68 of 130
Ms. Brune testifies that she saw certain emails before filing a July 21st letter and had knowledge of the July 15th conference call transcript. She disagrees that Ms. Trzaskoma's statements to the Court were incorrect.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 56 of 130
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Brune is being questioned about her knowledge and actions regarding a significant piece of information. She testifies that she did not initially consider it significant and did not immediately contact the court, but had the resources and team to investigate further if she had deemed it necessary.
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of certain facts and the drafting of a legal brief. They discuss their understanding of events and the reasoning behind the wording used in the brief. The testimony highlights potential discrepancies in interpretation and the context in which the brief was written.
Showing 15 of 64 documents. View all →
This dossier on MS. BRUNE was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.