Expert Opinion: 103-2
Summary
The document is an addendum opinion by David Perry QC on the extradition law of England and Wales, specifically addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's case. It concludes that Maxwell's extradition to the US is highly likely due to her breach of bail and the unlikelihood of successfully resisting extradition. The opinion also clarifies the limited grounds on which the Secretary of State can refuse extradition.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Expert Opinion/Declaration: 201-07-003230-AdmitDocID010321
The document discusses the Secretary of State's exceptional power to bar extradition under the Extradition Act 2003 and notes that it has been exercised only once since the enactment of the Act. It also highlights the typical timescales for extradition proceedings arising from US requests. The author, David Perry QC, concludes that none of the bars or exceptions to extradition would arise in Ms Maxwell's case based on currently known information.
court filing: 20-cr-60838-AJNT Document 1032 Filed 06/23/23 Page 9 of 15
The document discusses the extradition of Ms. Maxwell, citing expert opinions from Mr. Julié and David Perry, which contradict the government's assertions on the likelihood of extradition from France and the U.K. It argues that extradition is legally permissible and likely under the relevant treaties and laws.
Expert Opinion/Legal Brief: 2016-08-03-Adj-Def-#110821, ECF#3187
The document discusses the UK's extradition law under the 2003 Act, highlighting exceptions and bars to extradition, and the rarity of the Secretary of State's power to refuse extradition. It notes that extradition procedures are designed to be streamlined and typically conclude within two years. The author, David Perry QC, provides context for understanding the application of these laws in a specific case involving Ms Maxwell.
The document is an addendum opinion by David Perry QC on the extradition law of England and Wales, s...
The document is an addendum opinion by David Perry QC on the extradition law of England and Wales, specifically addressing Ghislaine Maxwell's case. It concludes that Maxwell's extradition to the US is highly likely due to her breach of bail and the unlikelihood of successfully resisting extradition. The opinion also clarifies the limited grounds on which the Secretary of State can refuse extradition.
PROFFER AGREEMENT [Signed Maxwell Proffer Agreement (Redacted)]
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of Ghislaine Maxwell ("Client") and his attorney, David Oscar Markus, Esq., with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida on July 24 and 25, 2025 ("the meeting"), ...
news article: 1:20-cr-00860
A juror in the Ghislane Maxwell trial spoke out after the guilty verdict, revealing his initial skepticism of the victims and his change of heart after hearing the evidence. The juror's statements have raised questions about potential juror misconduct and grounds for a mistrial. Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking charges related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.