Court Filing - Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony: 386
Summary
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio, arguing that her opinions on grooming and victim behavior are unreliable and prejudicial. The motion cites Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a Daubert hearing to assess the admissibility of Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
Related Documents (6)
Court Transcript: 745
The transcript is from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, discussing legal issues such as the admissibility of a photograph as impeachment evidence and the disclosure requirements under Rule 16. The judge and lawyers debate the nuances of impeachment by contradiction and the application of Rule 608.
Court Transcript: 765
The transcript captures a discussion between the judge, prosecution, and defense regarding jury instructions in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, focusing on whether to include 'foreign commerce' in the instructions. The prosecution and defense have differing opinions on the matter, with the prosecution arguing for its inclusion based on evidence of international travel, and the defense arguing for its exclusion.
Court Transcript: 767
The transcript records a court hearing on December 20, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan, where the prosecution and defense discussed trial logistics, including the redaction of sensitive materials and the timing of closing arguments. The court confirmed that all admitted exhibits had been docketed with tailored redactions and discussed the public availability of visual aids used during closing arguments. The hearing also touched on the timing and duration of the government's and defense's closing arguments.
Stipulation: 1009
This document is a stipulation between the United States Attorney's Office and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, agreeing to admit a specific stipulation as evidence at trial, marked as Government Exhibit 1009. The stipulation is dated December 10, 2021, and signed by representatives from both parties. It relates to the trial preparation and evidence submission in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Court Filing - Reply Memorandum: 103
This reply memorandum supports Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, arguing that the government's case relies heavily on the testimony of three witnesses without significant contemporaneous documentary evidence. Maxwell's defense presents a substantial bail package, including a bond secured by her and her spouse's assets and additional sureties, arguing that these conditions reasonably assure her appearance in court.
Court Filing - Reply Memorandum: 11032
This is a reply memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in support of her renewed motion for bail in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The document is part of the legal proceedings against Maxwell. It outlines the legal arguments and reasoning in favor of granting Maxwell bail.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.