deposition transcript: A-5740
Summary
The deposition of Ms. Brune discusses the credibility of government witnesses who pleaded guilty to making false statements, and the jury selection process in which Theresa Trzaskoma was involved. Brune testifies that she didn't believe certain information at the time, but acknowledges that she didn't know its veracity. The conversation with Trzaskoma is also explored.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03308
The deponent discusses their conversation with Susan Brune about the brief, their level of knowledge regarding juror misconduct, and the editing process. They decided to focus on whether a suspended lawyer and a juror were the same person. The deponent ultimately edited the fact section of the brief.
deposition: A-5732
The deposition of Ms. Brune discusses the jury selection process, specifically the selection of a juror with a criminal conviction and the consideration of juror availability for a lengthy trial. Brune confirms that having a criminal conviction was not automatically disqualifying for a juror and that availability was a significant concern during voir dire. The questioning reveals the thought process behind the jury selection and the factors that were considered.
deposition transcript: A-5763
The witness, Brune, testifies about their firm's involvement in jury research and investigation, including work done by Mr. Nardello's firm. Brune confirms that they did not disclose Nardello's firm's involvement to the judge during a phone call and resisted government discovery requests related to their firm's knowledge.
deposition: A-5781
The deponent discusses a conversation with Susan Brune and Theresa Trzaskoma about a note from Juror No. 1 and the discovery of a suspended New York lawyer with the same name. The deponent was unaware of the report and didn't ask to see the paper that formed Trzaskoma's belief. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the juror's note and its potential impact on the trial.
deposition transcript: A-5799
The witness testifies about their involvement in drafting a brief, discussions with Susan Brune about including certain facts, and the lack of discussion about sharing information with co-counsel. The witness edited the facts section of the brief and had a discussion with Susan Brune about whether to include certain facts.
deposition: A-5800
The deponent discusses their conversation with Susan Brune about the structure of a brief and how to address their level of knowledge regarding juror misconduct. They decided to focus on whether a suspended lawyer and a juror were the same person. The deponent ultimately edited the fact section of the brief.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.