deposition transcript: A-5746
The witness, Brune, is being questioned about her knowledge of a conversation regarding Trzaskoma's potential status as a suspended attorney and her team's actions during jury deliberations. Brune indicates she was not aware of the conversation at the time and that her team could have raised concerns before the verdict. The deposition highlights the witness's recollection of events and her team's presence during jury deliberations.
Summary
The witness, Brune, is being questioned about her knowledge of a conversation regarding Trzaskoma's potential status as a suspended attorney and her team's actions during jury deliberations. Brune indicates she was not aware of the conversation at the time and that her team could have raised concerns before the verdict. The deposition highlights the witness's recollection of events and her team's presence during jury deliberations.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Related Documents (6)
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 613 of 130
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Ms. Brune, where she is questioned about her knowledge of Ms. Trzaskoma's potential attorney suspension and the actions taken by her team during the eight-day jury deliberation period.
deposition: A-5771
The deponent is questioned about a document containing various addresses, lawsuits, and household information, including the identification of Robert J. Conrad as a spouse. The testimony confirms details about the document's content and the deponent's understanding of it. The document appears to be a subject of inquiry in a legal proceeding.
EFTA Document EFTA01481268
HAUL HOFFMAN PC P 002/013 MRR-06-2007(TUE) 16: 29 09/ ;23/ 20Er3 11,4: [it -344U- 114 -.4k1::-W? M.. 'WM. • FRS, • ARTICLES OF IN coittioRA JINN ciProVa MAR 2 9 NO1 OF JEEPERS, INC. FAGE 02(22 • ;..71 • * • _ ) j • 'P.17 C7'.- 71 r--,) We, the undersigned, for the purposes of associating to establish a corporffion for the transaction of the business and the promotion and conduct of the objects and purposes hereinafter stated, tinder thipirovisions ilia subject to the requir
EFTA Document EFTA01373994
currency; (xiv) Entering Into any and all understandings, options, letters of intent, contracts or agreements pertaining to any matters as to which the Consent of the Members is required hereunder without first presenting the same to and receiving the written approval of STC's legal counsel, Darren K. Indyke, Esq.; and (xv) With respect to any and all matters pertaining the Company, the Company's Artwork, and/or the operation of the Company's affairs, as to which a Member has made reaso
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03363-PAE
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Brune being questioned about her team's research on a potential juror, Catherine M. Conrad, and whether she had her team conduct additional research before voir dire. Ms. Brune admits that she did not ask her team to do so, relying instead on the voir dire process to determine if Catherine M. Conrad was the same person mentioned in a New York court opinion.
EFTA Document EFTA01306406
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/05/2020 12:59 P?' NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1:2 INDEX NO. 159224/2016 RECEIVEDg e NYSCEF: 03/05/2020 Pa April 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SHELDON BARR and THOMAS GARDNER, Plaintiffs, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK and 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, Defendants, INDEX NO.: 159225/2010 535 Fifth Avenue New York, New York April 9, 2019 10:07 a.m. X X 1 EXAMINATION BEFORE TRIAL of the Defendant, 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, by G
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.