court transcript: A-5836
The court discusses scheduling for the submission of briefs with counsel, accommodating Mr. Okula's vacation and Mr. Shechtman's month-long trial, ultimately setting a deadline of March 23 for initial briefs.
Summary
The court discusses scheduling for the submission of briefs with counsel, accommodating Mr. Okula's vacation and Mr. Shechtman's month-long trial, ultimately setting a deadline of March 23 for initial briefs.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
court transcript: A-5669
The transcript details the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who apologized for misrepresenting herself during jury selection. The court discusses the implications of her testimony and decides to release her from an arrest warrant. The transcript also covers the scheduling of the trial and the testimony of other witnesses.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
Deposition transcript: A-5660
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning revolves around a letter Conrad wrote, focusing on the capitalization of 'our government' and Conrad's opinions about other individuals involved in the case. The testimony touches on Conrad's state of mind and potential biases.
Court Transcript Index: A-5670
This is an index to a court transcript from the trial of Paul M. Daugerdas, detailing the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, as well as the receipt of various government and defense exhibits.
deposition transcript: A-5640
The document is a transcript of Conrad's deposition testimony, where they are questioned about their conduct in rejecting a subpoena, their medication, and their understanding of their rights during a hearing with Judge Pauley. Conrad's responses suggest a lack of clarity or cooperation, and the questioning attorney presses for specific details about their interactions with the judge and their financial situation.
deposition transcript: A-5658
The document is a transcript of Rosa Conrad's testimony, where she is questioned about her communication with prosecutors after the trial, her use of different names, and discrepancies in her personal information. The questioning highlights potential inconsistencies and biases in her testimony.
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.